Gateley's gamble - why law firms should heed accountancy's listing mistakes
Accountancy Age editor Kevin Reed sets out the lessons law firms can take from accountancy's listing failures
May 18, 2015 at 09:42 AM
3 minute read
It's fascinating to see Gateley outline plans for an AIM listing – which would make it the first law firm to list in the UK. Made possible with the opening up of ownership through the Legal Services Act, it's groundbreaking stuff.
Not so groundbreaking for accountants though.
They've had several pops at market listings over the years. But you'll struggle to name an accounting practice listed now. In fact, there aren't any… unless you count insolvency specialist Begbies Traynor.
The names of the fallen – Numerica, Vantis and RSM Tenon. All collapsed and now dissipated, absorbed and fragmented into other firms. Their demise came about for a multitude of problems: being listed was not the sole reason in itself. However, their stock exchange listings were absolutely integral to their problems.
Listing opened up the accounting firms to investment. And that investment was used to create more rapid growth than would have been possible organically. But this led to overexpansion and, also, overpaying in deals. Bringing together lots of different firms, offices and cultures is tough enough as it is.
Being listed places you under the gaze of shareholders, and involves lots of public reporting. In other words, the potential for dirty linen to be washed in public. Professional services firms are 'people businesses', and negative attention makes life a lot tougher on retention and recruitment.
External shareholders and investors want to see that share price tick up and up. As such, this puts pressure on the firm to operate in shorter timeframes.
And finally, just for good measure, converting partners into a directorship is fraught with difficulties. And this is the crux: can the firm keep up its 'partner' remuneration when another layer of shareholders and dividend receivers has been lobbed on top of them? A problem exacerbated if the share price drops – the equity value for those within the firm also falls. And who makes the decisions? Such a move makes it hard to remain collegiate.
It would also be interesting to know whether Gateley will use the opportunity to branch out and acquire accountants… that would certainly add another layer of complexity to matters, but would no doubt keep the headline writers happy.
I won't pretend to know all the ins and outs of Gateley's direction of travel – it's hard enough keeping up with all the accountancy firms. But I think Gateley will need to be extra careful in this move. I wish them all the best of luck, because they'll need a big dose of it.
Kevin Reed is editor of both Accountancy Age and Financial Director.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250