Addleshaw Goddard has bounced back to growth, but will it maintain its new-found momentum?
As the firm emerges from a tough few years, managing partner John Joyce reveals how the firm achieved its impressive results in 2014-15
June 08, 2015 at 07:36 PM
5 minute read
As results for the 2014-15 financial year start trickling into the public domain, one of the more impressive stories so far has been the performance of Addleshaw Goddard. After several difficult years, the national firm has bounced back with a 12% increase in revenue to £192.5m.
Compared with performance over the previous four financial years, over which turnover climbed by 2.3% and the firm incurred two years' of losses, it looks like Addleshaws might be back in business.
Furthermore, though it has yet to release its profit per equity partner number, several partners within the firm expect it to be in the region of £500,000. That would represent an increase of nearly 28% on last year's figure of £392,000 – all without a significant reduction in the number of equity partners.
But is this year's growth just a flash in the pan or a sign of more good things to come?
No doubt the firm has been helped along the way by a more buoyant market, as managing partner John Joyce (pictured) admits: "Transactional activity across the piece has been up; everyone will tell you that. That will always help us with such a strong corporate and banking practice.
"But the confidence within the place at the moment is at a six-year high. I like to think we will sustain that."
Also boosting the firm's performance is the fact that the upfront costs involved in setting up initiatives such as its paralegal transactional services team in Manchester and international offices in Hong Kong, Singapore, Doha, Dubai and Muscat are no longer weighing as heavily on the bottom line, in part because these ventures are now contributing more revenue.
Addleshaws also has less exposure to the kind of conditional fee arrangements that have burnt it on some high-profile litigation mandates in the past, with the firm saying the option is less popular with clients than before.
One pivotal theme that has emerged under Joyce's leadership since his election last year is a tighter grip on finances and partner performance.
Under a new five-year strategy, outlined in December, the firm is aiming for an equity ladder running from at least £300,000 a year up to £1m for its top-performing partners. It also wants to bring revenue up to at least £250m by the 2017-18 financial year and reduce annual staff turnover to 15%.
The boost in revenue, says Joyce, owes much to the same performance drive that underpins the strategy.
"That greater financial rigour was overdue," says one partner. "The main question has to be, but wasn't, 'are you doing the sort of things that will increase revenue?'"
Or, as one partner puts it more bluntly: "They're running the business like a business now and not like a religious crusade."
There have been multiple managed exits from the partnership as part of this additional financial rigour, Joyce confirms.
But not everything that has helped improve performance at Addleshaws over the last year has been quite so eye-catching.
For example, the firm has introduced new client feedback and pitch management systems to tighten up both processes.
It has also reviewed the use of the external coaches that help train its fee earners and rented out two floors of office space in its London office, one of which has already started having an impact on results. The other sublet, signed earlier this year, will bring in revenue in coming years.
Sustaining its new-found growth will involve all of the partners responding to the squeeze from the top but the firm is also looking externally for growth. "We definitely will continue to look at partner and team moves," says Joyce.
One question that still hovers over Addleshaws is whether it is still committed to seeking a merger after holding several discussions in recent years.
"Everyone is still talking about mergers," notes one Addleshaws partner. "It may be that we move within the next 12 months, or we might move in the next two years – it depends on what's out there – but plenty of firms are on the market."
One ex-partner adds: "I think this year has proved that Addleshaws can survive in its current state. But would it be better as part of something bigger? Probably. Are there partners who want to be part of that? Definitely."
In the meantime the firm is pushing ahead with its own expansion, launching a contract lawyer business earlier this month as part of a new business line called AG Consulting.
Whether or not further merger talks emerge, Addleshaws looks to have made a solid start at rediscovering the potential of a firm that still counts BP, Barclays and Diageo among its client list. The real question now is whether it can maintain this progress.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250