Slaughter and May unveils 89% autumn trainee retention rate
Firm is the first of the magic circle to reveal how many trainees will be staying on as lawyers when they qualify in September
July 16, 2015 at 02:25 PM
2 minute read
Slaughter and May has become the first magic circle firm to announce its autumn trainee retention rate, with the firm retaining 89% of its cohort of trainees.
The firm confirmed today (July 16) that two trainees, out of the total 37, withdrew from the process before the qualification offers were made. It made offers to all of the remaining 35 and two opted to decline a role at the firm.
The autumn retention rate is a sharp drop compared to 2014 when the firm retained 97% of its autumn qualifying trainees, with only one turning down the offer to become a newly qualified lawyer.
However, it is broadly on par with this year's spring retention rate when the firm made offers to 37 of the 40 trainees applying to be kept on as newly-qualified solicitors. Two trainees opted not to apply, meaning retention from the overall pool stood at 88%.
The firm declined to provide details of which practice areas the newly qualified lawyers will be joining.
This week, Taylor Wessing announced that it would retain 87% – 20 out of 23 – trainees as newly qualified solicitors in September. This is down from 91% for the equivalent cohort in 2014.
However, other firms have recently posted retention rates of up to 100%. Also this week, Jones Day said it would retain all of its 15 second year trainees as newly qualified lawyers in its London office.
Last week, White & Case and Sullivan & Cromwell also posted 100% retention rates for London trainees qualifying in September this year.
In June, Latham announced that it will keep 95% of its London trainees when they qualify this September while Shearman & Sterling will retain all of its 13 trainees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMalaysia’s Shearn Delamore Set To Expand Local Footprint With New Office Launch
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
- 1High Court Rejects 'Heightened' Standard for Employers Defending FLSA Cases
- 2Case With 'Serious Consequences for Corporate Law' Heads to Texas Supreme Court
- 3Oil Co. Alleges Plot to Drive Away Competition in NYC's Liquid Fuel Market
- 4Takeaways From Day One of Pam Bondi’s Confirmation Hearing
- 5Greenberg Traurig, Holland & Knight Leaders Expect AI Investments to Jump in 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250