More names emerge in race to become Linklaters managing partner
Operational intelligence group head and litigation chief join five other contenders as firm prepares long list of candidates
July 26, 2015 at 08:07 PM
4 minute read
Further names have emerged in the race to become Linklaters' next managing partner as operational intelligence group head Tom Shropshire and litigation head Michael Bennett join the list of potential candidates.
The news comes as the firm's partnership board is sounding out partners about further contenders.
Sources close to Linklaters have said Shropshire and Bennett are among the candidates on a long list of names being drawn up by the board, which is likely to grow.
Shropshire has previously held senior positions within the firm, including a stint on the international board.
Bennett has been London litigation head since 2007 and was appointed global litigation head for a four-year term in 2014. He also has a seat on the firm's executive committee.
Other candidates partners say are in contention for the job include banking head Gideon Moore, Asia managing partner Marc Harvey, head of finance and projects Michael Kent, head of corporate Matthew Middleditch and Amsterdam-based European managing partner Pieter Riemer.
Moore was appointed banking head in 2011, replacing Robert Elliott in the role following his election to senior partner. Moore was previously head of the firm's leveraged finance practice.
A partner at Linklaters said his inclusion on the list was understandable: "There will be support [for Moore]. The banking cabal tends to stick reasonably closely together."
Hong Kong-based Middleditch was Asia corporate chief before being promoted to head of corporate in 2014. "Middleditch would be the people's favourite," said a former Linklaters lawyer. "He is a fantastic lawyer, a very old-fashioned city gent. I can't imagine anyone being against that type of appointment; the only question would be whether he has the personality for the schmoozing."
Commenting on Riemer's inclusion on the list, one Linklaters partner said: "Riemer is certainly someone who, on the face of it, has the capabilities to fulfil the role. The question is whether he is sufficiently known and trusted in London."
Meanwhile, a former Linklaters lawyer said of Harvey, who is understood to have expressed an interest in standing: "He is less well known in London because he has spent so much time in Asia. But he probably has the pedigree and is a very fair and even-handed guy who wouldn't be a divisive appointment."
Kent is also thought to have expressed an interest in the position. He was appointed to his current role earlier in the year and sits on the firm's executive committee.
The announcement earlier this month that current managing partner Simon Davies will leave the firm early at the end of this year to take up a senior role at Lloyds Bank has brought forward the management race.
Legal Week understands that the first step in the selection process involves the partnership board drawing up a long list of potential candidates. The names on the list include people who have indicated that they want to be considered as well as others prompted to put themselves forward by the board.
One Linklaters partner said the board was asking key partners to put forward further names to add to those already on the list.
Successful candidates will need to gain sizeable support from the London office, where the bulk of the firm's partners are based. A Linklaters partner said: "The problem is you need to find people outside of London who are sufficiently known in London."
The partnership board will draw up the long list over the summer, before whittling it down until one contender remains. The board will then propose that candidate to the partnership for a confirmatory vote. The new managing partner will be named by the firm's partnership conference in November.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs KPMG’s Arizona ABS Strategy a Turning Point in U.S. Law? What London’s Experience Reveals
5 minute readIsrael's Rushed Corporate Tax May Spark Law Firm Mergers, Boost Large Firms Including Gornitzky
4 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250