UK-wide rising corporate stars: "I have only been a partner in the post-crunch era so the work you need to put in to win new business and create deep relationships is all I have ever known."
UK-wide firm rising stars and corporate chiefs weigh in on what it takes to make it in a post-credit crunch world.
August 07, 2015 at 12:52 PM
20 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For the rising corporate stars at UK-wide firms who made partner in the aftermath of the financial crisis, the world of scarce work, hot fee competition and a pressing need to go out and land clients is the only one they have experienced.
Anthony Walsh of Eversheds, who made partner in May 2011, says:
"People talk about the new normal but I have only been a partner in the post-crunch era so the work you need to put in to win new business and create deep relationships is all I have ever known."
In many ways the challenges remain the same as they have always been. How do you handle the transition from having a pipeline of work coming through to standing on your own two feet and what is the most effective strategy to build a client following?
However, the additional pressures of a post-recession world have meant that younger partners have had to adapt to survive and thrive.
Building your profile
A key challenge for any new partner is coping with the challenge of building a client following and generating fee revenue. Christopher Taylor of Addleshaw Goddard who made partner in 2010 says:
"In a firm like Addleshaw Goddard you are required to effectively step up to the role of partnership and win your own work from day one, you are no longer given work by other partners rather you have to go and find it."
However, it would be misleading to suggest that this challenge only starts the day a lawyer becomes partner. In the years pre-partnership the network that lawyers build and the clients they work with are the key to establishing a strong book of business at partner level.
Mark Wesker of Osborne Clarke who made partner in May 2014 argues that a lot of the key work is done in the years before promotion, he says:
"In many ways, the transition takes place in the two years or so before the promotion. That is of course a challenging time for you in your career - you are to some extents doing the job of partner and also the job of senior associate simultaneously."
Individual firms handle the transition differently. Bob Bishop, head of DLA Piper's international corporate group says:
"We try to ensure that our new partners continue working with more senior partners on certain deals (where appropriate), so they can continue to learn the ropes."
Lawyers are generally reaching the partnership at a later age and with more experience. And firms are cognisant of the difficulties new partners face and do their best to help manage the transition.
Greg Leyshon head of Osborne Clarke's business transactions group says:
"The key difference when you become a partner is that your focus changes to one of developing relationships and developing new client opportunities. The emphasis changes quite dramatically which is quite a shock for some people. We try and prepare our senior associates going through that transition by getting them heavily involved in client relationship meetings and pitches so it is not so much of a shock for them when they are promoted to partner."
Firms clearly put a great deal of time and effort into preparing associates for the partnership. However, it is still the case that when it comes down to it, it is up to the individual whether they sink or swim. Making partner in the years following the credit crunch has provided a tough school for the newer generation of partners and they have had to focus their approach in order to flourish.
The end of the generalist.
One thing that the stars of the post-2010 generation agree
on is that the age of the corporate generalist has been and gone. To thrive in a competitive market, lawyers need to present a unique set of skills or knowledge to stand out to prospective clients.
Leyshon says: "The days of making partner as a generalist M&A partner and building a career around that are long gone. You tend to find that the more successful partners are able to do a broad base of M&A work but then focus on particular industry sectors and particular client types."
Pinsent Masons M&A partner Nicole Livesey has built her practice around a focus on the manufacturing sector. She says: "Having a sector specialism sets you apart, builds your reputation to get you in front of clients and results in you being able to undertake the transactions effectively, focussing on and pre-empting the issues that truly matter."
It would be wrong to suggest that a narrow focus is the key to success. M&A partners are expected to have honed their technical abilities and client handling skills in the earlier years of their career so as to be able to handle a wide array of deals. However lawyers need to be adaptable to both changes in the market and changes in technology and use that broad base of experience as the foundation for a more unique offering.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co's head of corporate Sunil Kakkad, says:
"The ability to adapt to market trends is very important, while that doesn't mean that you need a chameleon-like ability to switch between sectors, it does help having a strong focus on one or two sectors."
The challenge of adapting to new technologies and market conditions is one that all lawyers face. Indeed, Leyshon argues that younger partners may be better placed than many when it comes to adapting to changes in the legal market. He says: "Younger partners are more tech savvy by and large and a little more open to dramatic innovation. They tend to be early adopters of new ways of doing things that often help them."
Going national
For partners in UK-wide law firms there is considerable difference of opinion about the most effective way to establish a strong client following and a good flow of work. For some, it is all about building key relationships locally and standing out in your immediate market place. For others location isn't important, it is more about building skills and experience that they can then go out and sell to clients, where ever they may be.
Shoosmiths partner Kieran Toal says: "I am a local lad and I have been in the Manchester market for all of my legal career. Peers who were at a junior level with me are now decisions makers who are able to decide or influence where work is given. You can't ignore national or international and both are important in building a practice in a national UK law firm, but I seem to have benefited from being in the Manchester market doing deals over many years and those relationships have been a key source of work for me."
Fellow Manchester lawyer, Pinsent Masons corporate and private equity partner Andrew Phillips had a similar view point, saying:
"It is quite a close knit professional community in the corporate finance space. You get the ability to get to know a lot of people very well and if you can embed yourself in that market it should breed work if you do the work well."
For many partners, exposure to national and international clients will have been something they were familiar with from the early days of post-qualification and the challenge will be how to balance the need to establish a local practice with the demands of clients in far flung locations.
Keith Froud, Eversheds global head of company commercial shared his thoughts on the most effective way to build a profile, saying:
"Some people would be focused on a particular part of the market or a specific sector with clients which are not necessarily local to them, but other partners will earn their spurs in their immediate market. Within Eversheds all of our partners will have worked with clients from geographies around the world so they will be building that experience and that contact and client base as they go along."
It is clear then, that there are a number of different strategies to follow when building a client following. However, the partners of the post-2010 generation do have a lot in common. All came of age in an environment when to do work meant going out and getting it, specialisation was key to beating the competition and having to adapt and innovate to deal with changes in the market and technology was mandatory. It may have been a tough ride, but the experiences they have gone through should see them well equipped to face whatever the legal market throws at them.
For the rising corporate stars at UK-wide firms who made partner in the aftermath of the financial crisis, the world of scarce work, hot fee competition and a pressing need to go out and land clients is the only one they have experienced.
Anthony Walsh of
"People talk about the new normal but I have only been a partner in the post-crunch era so the work you need to put in to win new business and create deep relationships is all I have ever known."
In many ways the challenges remain the same as they have always been. How do you handle the transition from having a pipeline of work coming through to standing on your own two feet and what is the most effective strategy to build a client following?
However, the additional pressures of a post-recession world have meant that younger partners have had to adapt to survive and thrive.
Building your profile
A key challenge for any new partner is coping with the challenge of building a client following and generating fee revenue. Christopher Taylor of
"In a firm like
However, it would be misleading to suggest that this challenge only starts the day a lawyer becomes partner. In the years pre-partnership the network that lawyers build and the clients they work with are the key to establishing a strong book of business at partner level.
Mark Wesker of Osborne Clarke who made partner in May 2014 argues that a lot of the key work is done in the years before promotion, he says:
"In many ways, the transition takes place in the two years or so before the promotion. That is of course a challenging time for you in your career - you are to some extents doing the job of partner and also the job of senior associate simultaneously."
Individual firms handle the transition differently. Bob Bishop, head of
"We try to ensure that our new partners continue working with more senior partners on certain deals (where appropriate), so they can continue to learn the ropes."
Lawyers are generally reaching the partnership at a later age and with more experience. And firms are cognisant of the difficulties new partners face and do their best to help manage the transition.
Greg Leyshon head of Osborne Clarke's business transactions group says:
"The key difference when you become a partner is that your focus changes to one of developing relationships and developing new client opportunities. The emphasis changes quite dramatically which is quite a shock for some people. We try and prepare our senior associates going through that transition by getting them heavily involved in client relationship meetings and pitches so it is not so much of a shock for them when they are promoted to partner."
Firms clearly put a great deal of time and effort into preparing associates for the partnership. However, it is still the case that when it comes down to it, it is up to the individual whether they sink or swim. Making partner in the years following the credit crunch has provided a tough school for the newer generation of partners and they have had to focus their approach in order to flourish.
The end of the generalist.
One thing that the stars of the post-2010 generation agree
on is that the age of the corporate generalist has been and gone. To thrive in a competitive market, lawyers need to present a unique set of skills or knowledge to stand out to prospective clients.
Leyshon says: "The days of making partner as a generalist M&A partner and building a career around that are long gone. You tend to find that the more successful partners are able to do a broad base of M&A work but then focus on particular industry sectors and particular client types."
It would be wrong to suggest that a narrow focus is the key to success. M&A partners are expected to have honed their technical abilities and client handling skills in the earlier years of their career so as to be able to handle a wide array of deals. However lawyers need to be adaptable to both changes in the market and changes in technology and use that broad base of experience as the foundation for a more unique offering.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co's head of corporate Sunil Kakkad, says:
"The ability to adapt to market trends is very important, while that doesn't mean that you need a chameleon-like ability to switch between sectors, it does help having a strong focus on one or two sectors."
The challenge of adapting to new technologies and market conditions is one that all lawyers face. Indeed, Leyshon argues that younger partners may be better placed than many when it comes to adapting to changes in the legal market. He says: "Younger partners are more tech savvy by and large and a little more open to dramatic innovation. They tend to be early adopters of new ways of doing things that often help them."
Going national
For partners in UK-wide law firms there is considerable difference of opinion about the most effective way to establish a strong client following and a good flow of work. For some, it is all about building key relationships locally and standing out in your immediate market place. For others location isn't important, it is more about building skills and experience that they can then go out and sell to clients, where ever they may be.
Shoosmiths partner Kieran Toal says: "I am a local lad and I have been in the Manchester market for all of my legal career. Peers who were at a junior level with me are now decisions makers who are able to decide or influence where work is given. You can't ignore national or international and both are important in building a practice in a national UK law firm, but I seem to have benefited from being in the Manchester market doing deals over many years and those relationships have been a key source of work for me."
Fellow Manchester lawyer,
"It is quite a close knit professional community in the corporate finance space. You get the ability to get to know a lot of people very well and if you can embed yourself in that market it should breed work if you do the work well."
For many partners, exposure to national and international clients will have been something they were familiar with from the early days of post-qualification and the challenge will be how to balance the need to establish a local practice with the demands of clients in far flung locations.
Keith Froud,
"Some people would be focused on a particular part of the market or a specific sector with clients which are not necessarily local to them, but other partners will earn their spurs in their immediate market. Within
It is clear then, that there are a number of different strategies to follow when building a client following. However, the partners of the post-2010 generation do have a lot in common. All came of age in an environment when to do work meant going out and getting it, specialisation was key to beating the competition and having to adapt and innovate to deal with changes in the market and technology was mandatory. It may have been a tough ride, but the experiences they have gone through should see them well equipped to face whatever the legal market throws at them.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Freshfields' Rebrand: Firm Still Committed to Germany, Senior Partner Says
4 minute readWhich Law Firms Have the Most Followers on Social Media?
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250