'Europe is open to business' - competition partners welcome GE/Alstom deal
Competition advisers on the £9bn merger discuss its likely impact on future M&A levels following EU competition clearance
September 11, 2015 at 12:16 AM
3 minute read
After more than a year-long probe, the European Commission has cleared the final hurdle for General Electric's €12.4bn (£9bn) acquisition of Alstom's power business after it agreed to sell some of the French company's turbine assets to Italian rival Ansaldo Energia.
The deal will bring together two of the world's biggest manufacturers of power plant hardware.
A clutch of law firms won roles on the transaction including Slaughter and May, Weil Gotshal & Manges, Hogan Lovells, Clifford Chance (CC) and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom.
GE instructed Slaughters to advise on corporate, financing and pensions and employment aspects with a team that included City corporate partners Frances Murphy and Padraig Cronin. Slaughters' best friend network firm in France Bredin Prat also advised on corporate aspects.
It turned to Brussels-based Skadden partner and European antitrust chief Simon Baxter for advice on competition law alongside CC's Tony Reeves in Brussels.
For the GE bid, Alstom instructed a Weil Gotshal team led by Paris-based corporate partner David Aknin, and a Hogan Lovells competition team headed by Brussels partner and antitrust head Jacques Derenne.
![baxter-simon-5x7 baxter-simon-5x7](/IMG/815/326815/baxter-simon-230x230.png?1449029291)
Both Alstom and GE said they now expect to finalise the deal as early as possible in the fourth quarter.
Commenting on the process of securing competition clearance, Skadden's Baxter (pictured) says: "Why did it take so long? It was a big case and all eyes were on the deal."
Weil's Aknin adds: "There is more regulation now and this deal shows that the EU will be very vigilant on antitrust aspects creating additional delays."
Baxter supports a statement by EU commissioner for competition Margrethe Vestager earlier this week, in which she highlighted the importance of the case for showing that European companies wanted investment from overseas.
He comments: "[It shows] Europe is open to business. It was seen as a test case: whether an acquisition of a large European industrial like Alstom could be permitted to proceed."
Another partner close to the deal says that Vestager "went out of her way to say Europe is open to investment", adding: "I think she's an active and vigorous enforcer and I think companies watched closely to see what she would do. She's had a lot of criticism after the Google antitrust case so she's a bit on the defensive."
Last month (27 August), Google rejected a European Commission proposal to change the way it ranks search results after EU regulators accused it of abusing its dominant position by steering European consumers to its own in-house shopping service.
EU regulators are also still investigating whether Google's Android mobile operating system has breached EU antitrust rules by stifling rival mobile operating systems.
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton is representing Google on the shopping complaint and the Android case. Allen & Overy is also advising the company on the Android case.
On the complainant's side across both issues, Clifford Chance is representing a consortium with about 15 members called FairSearch, as well as three individual members of the consortium: Oracle, Nokia and Allegro.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Perkins Coie Builds in London With Ex-Norton Rose Fulbright Brussels Head Perkins Coie Builds in London With Ex-Norton Rose Fulbright Brussels Head](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7c/90/ad855f80454fb72398da4f0c1f4b/cole-miranda-5x6-767x633.jpg)
Perkins Coie Builds in London With Ex-Norton Rose Fulbright Brussels Head
2 minute read![Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bd/aa/17b2d3f34add8eecd89c67e33ab3/adobestock-1093137278-editorial-use-only-767x633.jpg)
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute read![‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator ‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/a9/aa/8610bdf3436fb7c12a41bc9e3f6d/city-of-london-767x633.jpg)
‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator
![CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7a/19/1773f2f04ea39a16af094bbb2b80/google-sign-767x633.jpg)
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
Trending Stories
- 1We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 2Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 3How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 4How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 5Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250