Strong success for the mid-tier as UK-wide firms come roaring back
Firms with UK-wide office networks significantly out perform the rest of the market and reflect the return to growth in the UK economy
September 18, 2015 at 08:42 AM
6 minute read
If the number of taxis waiting outside Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's Fleet Street offices at 11pm can be used as a crude barometer of merger activity in the City, then the financial performance of firms with national practices can be taken as a measure of activity levels in the wider UK economy.
The 13 firms in the top 50 with large domestic presences beyond London saw combined revenues grow by 11.6% – driven only in part by mergers – suggesting a return to form for the UK-wide firms and the UK economy as a whole.
Claire Rowe, chief executive of Shoosmiths (pictured, right), sums up the trend, saying: "What I see is the success of the national firms like Shoosmiths who are doing very well in the mid-tier market. However, the international firms who are more subject to the vagaries of the international market have not had quite such stellar results. We are certainly seeing a strong success story for that mid-tier."
The firms that make up the UK-wide cohort in Legal Week's Top 50 UK rankings have a strong network of offices throughout the UK, and while firms like Eversheds and Osborne Clarke also have international practices, most of the firms in this group generate much of their revenue domestically. Given our rankings this year include the full global revenue of DLA Piper rather than just its business outside the US for the first time, we have excluded the firm from this grouping.
Combined revenue across the UK-wide group climbed from £1.714bn to £1.912bn: an increase of 11.6% in total revenue, representing an average growth rate of 15.2%. Even after stripping out the data for recently merged firms Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co and Blake Morgan, whose combinations resulted in 48.8% and 51.4% increases in respective turnover, the remaining 11 firms grew by a healthy 7.4%.
This far exceeds performance across the top 50 as a whole where combined revenue increased by 4% and average revenue was down 2.2%. Similarly the magic circle saw average revenue growth of 3%, while revenue across the top 10 firms declined by an average 0.3% as currency fluctuations took their toll.
|- Click here for the full Legal Week UK top 50 table
- Click here for a key stats breakdown, including the top firms for PEP, revenue per lawyer and more
The UK-wide firms were also successful in 2014-15 when measured by profitability and profit per equity partner (PEP). The eight firms in the group which reported PEP figures for both 2013-14 and 2014-15 saw PEP grow by an average of 14.8%, from £389,400 in 2013-14 to £441,100 in 2014-15. Three of the top five performers by PEP growth in the whole of the UK top 50 are national firms: Shoosmiths, Pinsent Masons and Bond Dickinson, recording respective PEP increases of 42%, 32.8% and 26.2% respectively. Driven by the two aforementioned mergers, partner numbers across the group grew by 5.2%, from 1,934 in 2013-14 to 2,035 in 2014-15.
So what drove the growth at these firms and why did they fare so much better than the global behemoths that inhabit the upper reaches of the top 50?
The return to growth in the UK economy was clearly the number one reason for the strong financial performance of the UK-wide law firms. As Peter Morris (pictured, right), managing partner of Burges Salmon, says: "Our focus is primarily the domestic market and UK Plc continues to do pretty well."
Activity was well distributed by both region and industry sectors: managing partners interviewed for this piece variously picked out corporate, banking, private wealth, retail, transport and automotive as sectors within their firms that had experienced particularly strong years. However, real estate was a sector almost unanimously identified as a key driver of growth in the last financial year.
Bond Dickinson's Jonathan Blair summarised the trend saying: "Real estate is strong and across the legal sector real estate is experiencing a bounce back which is good news for the UK economy."
Wragges chief executive David Fennell was similarly bullish about the health of the property market saying: "Coming out of the merger we put together two very strong real estate practices – we now have great teams across both the housing and commercial sectors – and this will continue to be a growth area for us over the next few years."
Law firm leaders argue it is this transactional growth in particular which boosted their practices, many of which struggled in the recession and its aftermath, losing partners, and seeing revenue and profitability plummet.
Firms with wider international office networks and those earning significant amounts in foreign currency, also tended to be hit by the fluctuations in the currency markets which impacted on their revenue. In contrast, firms earning most of their revenue in sterling and operating primarily in the domestic market benefitted from the positive economic conditions and were largely shielded from the turbulence experienced around the world.
However, in a globalised world an economic downturn in Wuhan can impact on output in Warrington, as Morris points out: "UK plc is not insulated from global effects so over the next few months we are optimistic, but there are a lot of things going on outside our control and we don't know what their impact will be."
Eversheds chief executive Bryan Hughes (pictured, right) warns some within this group of firms need to internationalise more: "Those firms that chose to be UK centric, unless they have a particular niche, may have followed the wrong path strategically as clients have looked to globalise to find growth and law firms have created global networks to service the needs of existing and new clients."
However, the financial results recorded by firms with strong domestically focused practices show that for 2014-15 at least, making a bet on the UK was a good strategy.
|- Click here to see the UK Top 50 table in full
- Click here for a breakdown of the key stats
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
BCLP Mulls Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250