Is the legal profession facing its own turning point?
Are the students of today ready for the legal sector of tomorrow - and more importantly, is the law ready for them?
September 21, 2015 at 07:09 AM
3 minute read
Are the students of today ready for the legal sector of tomorrow – and more importantly, is the law ready for them?
Over a year ago Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP), in association with Legal Week, set up the Turning Points hub to answer these and many other challenging questions. The hub was created as a unique space for the lawyers of tomorrow (and today) to start an open conversation about the personal turning points affecting legal careers now and in the future.
When it first launched, the Hub lifted the lid on the expectations of current law students as they begin forging their careers, and went on to host some seriously career-boosting/inspiring turning (and learning) points from some of the great and good of the profession today.
As a new academic years kicks off, we've turned to the student community once again to get its views on two of the most vital issues shaping the future of the legal profession now – social diversity and alternative routes into the industry.
There are new initiatives from bodies governing the legal industry like the Law Society alongside a greater understanding from law firms that they need fresh types of applicants with different qualities and skills to meet the requirements of clients in today's market. The challenges of a changing legal landscape have meant that the soft launch of newer routes into law is quickly snowballing into accepted practice across the industry.
Elsewhere, campaigners are keeping up the pressure on social diversity in the legal sector; diversity statistics are now given just as much credence as firms' financial performance in the eyes of clients, and newer routes into law are frequently billed as a way of cracking this issue.
But while the conversation around entry into the profession may have widened out from simply the law degree, conversion course and training contract formula, have the attitudes of those who it affects the most – the students trying to qualify – changed radically too?
We're keen to find out about what the next generation of lawyers really think about these new routes into law and the issue of social diversity within the profession – is securing a training contract still the be all and end all, or does an earn-while-you-learn scheme seem a good way to go? Should law firms prioritise commercial, non-legal qualifications in their search for the best talent to take their firms into the future? How much will your own social background impact on your future career in the law?
We recently conducted a survey on these issues and more – look out for a write-up of the results on the Turning Points hub in the coming weeks.
This article was commissioned for the Turning Points hub, an online career development resource from Legal Week in association with Berwin Leighton Paisner.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250