Disputes work drives turnover growth at UK top 50 firms
Work in litigation accounts for a larger proportion of turnover than either corporate or finance work
September 22, 2015 at 01:03 AM
4 minute read
Disputes work brought in more than a quarter of combined revenue across the UK's largest law firms last year.
Legal Week's annual UK top 50 ranking found that, of the 35 firms providing a breakdown of turnover by practice area, litigation brought in the largest share of total revenue in 2014-15, at 27.9%.
This is marginally higher than corporate, which accounted for 26.5% of total revenue, and almost double the finance percentage of 14%.
Including data from the traditionally disputes-strong insurance firms – Clyde & Co, Kennedys, DAC Beachcroft, Holman Fenwick Willan and Weightmans – the percentage of revenue generated by litigation rose to 33.2%. Across these firms Kennedys received the largest percentage of its fee income at 86%.
Outside this group Browne Jacobson and Stephenson Harwood has the largest disputes practices as a proportion of total revenue at 55% and 47.6% respectively.
By value, DLA Piper took the most in disputes turnover at £571.1m in 2014-15. This constituted 38% of its total revenue, which stood at £1.5028bn. There was a 12 percentage point difference between corporate and litigation turnover, with corporate fee income of £390.7m making up 26% of total revenue.
Commenting on the results, Simon Levine, DLA Piper's co-chief executive officer, said: "Corporate has done particularly well; we had our fair share of deal volume and quantum. The market has become much more sophisticated than it was 10 years ago."
Hogan Lovells recorded the second highest disputes turnover of any firm with £323.4m. Disputes work made up 30% of its total revenue, which stood at £1.08bn. The firm recorded only a one percentage point difference between disputes and corporate; its corporate turnover stood at £334.2m, making up 31% of its total revenue.
|- Click here for the full Legal Week UK top 50 table
- Click here for a key stats breakdown, including the top firms for PEP, revenue per lawyer and more
Andrea Monks, litigation partner at Hogan Lovells in London, said: "English courts continue to be an attractive place for litigants to bring their disputes. And on top of litigation in the courts, there's also been significant enforcement activity by financial regulators recently, which has driven activity across contentious practices in the City, particularly those who act for financial services institutions."
Out of the main three practice areas firms were asked to provide revenue figures for (corporate, litigation and finance), finance made up the smallest share of firms' total revenue. It accounted for 12.8% of revenue across all of the firms surveyed.
Looking at finance revenue, CMS had the second highest turnover, taking £162.6m in the practice area in 2014-15. Finance work constituted 21.6% of its revenue for the financial year, which totalled £753.9m. However, it was the firm's corporate practice that was its biggest with £258m of revenue.
CMS managing partner Duncan Weston (pictured) said: "Our corporate practice continues to have a strong pipeline of large deals which is a sign of a strong economy."
Twenty-five of the firms in the UK top 50 provided a breakdown of their fee income by region, with the numbers skewed by the fact many of the most international firms did not provide this data. Of those that did, combined turnover in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA), including the UK, totalled £3.75bn, the largest of any region. UK turnover alone accounted for 55.3% of these firms' total revenue at £3.34bn.
Firms' total revenue in the Asia Pacific region was £264.9m, which accounted for just 4.4% of its overall revenue.
The Americas accounted for 20.7% of total global revenue for firms taking part in the survey. That figure was pushed up by DLA Piper's and Hogan Lovells' large presence in the region.
|NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
BCLP Mulls Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250