Legal Week launches newly redesigned website
New website aims to offer more user-friendly experience, automatically adjusting to whatever device you are using, be it computer, tablet or smartphone
October 21, 2015 at 07:51 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Legal Week has a brand new website. The new site, launched after extensive reader research, is designed to make our news, analysis and features easier to find and more enjoyable to read.
The new website is fully responsive, which means it will automatically adjust to whatever device you are using - computer, tablet or smartphone.
The site now features more images, making it easier to click on stories on mobile devices, while we have also given more prominence to our long-form journalism by making it more accessible and visually appealing.
For example, the Legal Week Top 50 - our comprehensive analysis of the financial results of the leading UK law firms - now has a permanent berth on the homepage alongside other showcase in-depth analysis.
Not that news will be any less important than before: our commitment to providing readers with must-have news, analysis and commentary is unchanged. Rather we now have a website that highlights all of our content more effectively, however and wherever you choose to view it.
The relaunch comes after Legal Week stopped printing in July, and reflects our subscribers' increasing desire to access all of our journalism on the move.
We recently launched our Legal Week Live mobile app, which allows users to view articles offline, save and share favourite stories, and customise the type of content they view.
The end result of all of these changes, we hope, is a vastly improved user experience for our subscribers, allowing us to consolidate our position as a trusted digital information source for senior business lawyers.
We hope you enjoy using the new site. Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any feedback good or bad.
Click here for a full guided tour of the new website.
- For information about subscriptions, please contact our customer services department on 01858438427 or email [email protected].
Legal Week has a brand new website. The new site, launched after extensive reader research, is designed to make our news, analysis and features easier to find and more enjoyable to read.
The new website is fully responsive, which means it will automatically adjust to whatever device you are using - computer, tablet or smartphone.
The site now features more images, making it easier to click on stories on mobile devices, while we have also given more prominence to our long-form journalism by making it more accessible and visually appealing.
For example, the Legal Week Top 50 - our comprehensive analysis of the financial results of the leading UK law firms - now has a permanent berth on the homepage alongside other showcase in-depth analysis.
Not that news will be any less important than before: our commitment to providing readers with must-have news, analysis and commentary is unchanged. Rather we now have a website that highlights all of our content more effectively, however and wherever you choose to view it.
The relaunch comes after Legal Week stopped printing in July, and reflects our subscribers' increasing desire to access all of our journalism on the move.
We recently launched our Legal Week Live mobile app, which allows users to view articles offline, save and share favourite stories, and customise the type of content they view.
The end result of all of these changes, we hope, is a vastly improved user experience for our subscribers, allowing us to consolidate our position as a trusted digital information source for senior business lawyers.
We hope you enjoy using the new site. Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any feedback good or bad.
Click here for a full guided tour of the new website.
- For information about subscriptions, please contact our customer services department on 01858438427 or email [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250