Linklaters managing partner hustings dominated by US strategy, remuneration and partnership relations
Final stages of managing partner election debate see candidates focus on the future of the firm's US strategy and lockstep
October 25, 2015 at 08:08 PM
4 minute read
Linklaters' managing partner hustings have been dominated by debate over the firm's US strategy, a potential lockstep review and relations between management and partners.
The firm is in the process of selecting a new managing partner after Simon Davies, the current post holder, unexpectedly announced in July that he was stepping down early to take up a senior role at Lloyds Bank in January 2016. His exit will take place a year before his term was due to end.
The final three contenders in the race to succeed him have been touring Linklaters' offices to speak to partners about their vision for the firm.
Asia head Marc Harvey, banking head Gideon Moore and litigation head Michael Bennett have hit the road to drum up support for their priorities.
Legal Week understands that all three have been talking about similar issues including US strategy, the prospect of a review of the firm's partner remuneration structure and how to improve the relationship between management and the partnership.
Watching America
Success in the US is seen as key to the firm fulfilling its ambitions. A former partner says: "To be a credible international firm with ambition to be the best, you have to have proper resources in all the key financial markets, of which the US is fundamental."
Former partners say that there is recognition within Linklaters that other UK firms have stolen a march in America, either by merging with US firms or pursuing a more enthusiastic US hiring strategy.
Another former partner comments: "There must be a realisation that firms which have done US mergers, which would not previously have been considered as competitors, are getting lots of traction because of having a bigger US presence."
Another ex-Linklaters partner says that Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's drive to build up its US arm – where senior hires have included former partners of firms such as Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom – would prompt Linklaters to review its own approach. "They tend to measure themselves by each other, as they are very similar, if one has a strategy and the other hasn't, one will look at that strategy," he says.
One former partner says discussions about the firm's remuneration structure and its US strategy are linked.
"The strategy would be about how to get the best people out of the US firms into Linklaters." He adds:
"The challenge for Linklaters is do you break lockstep?"
Linklaters' lockstep runs from 10 to 25 points over 10 to 12 years. Reform of the system was previously discussed at the firm's April partner conference with ideas mooted including bringing in flexibility to better reward high-performing junior equity partners.
Another former partner also believes reviewing lockstep is key to the firm's international expansion. He says:
"If you have ambitions to be a global law firm then you are going to have to have some flexibility in your compensation."
He adds that lockstep has been a lingering issue for some time but the fact that Davies (pictured) failed to receive the required 75% majority in the 2012 partnership vote to confirm his reappointment and was only appointed after a second round of voting, hampered efforts at reform.
"The kerfuffle with Simon Davies' re-election put on hold any ability to have a meaningful conversation about compensation. After the non-election he didn't really have the mandate to run something quite as fundamental as a review of the lockstep," he says.
Relationship management
The need for debate over relations between management and the partnership is also a legacy of Davies' watch, which saw two restructurings, including a painful restructuring of the partnership in 2012 with 25 partners asked to leave, and 16 stripped of their equity status or asked to take a reduced profit share.
A former partner comments "it was a very odd situation where you have the owners of the business at odds with the management of the business".
Ex-partners though are optimistic about the future state of relations between management and the partnership, with one saying the candidates were "three super guys".
Once the hustings have finished the firm's partnership board will meet to select the successful candidate.
The board's choice will then be ratified by a vote of the partnership at the firm's November 17 partner conference.
Linklaters declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKing & Spalding, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Launch Pro Bono Legal Initiative for Tennis Players
2 minute readClifford Chance Among Advisers as Prince Harry Newspaper Hearing Begins
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250