Linklaters managing partner hustings dominated by US strategy, remuneration and partnership relations
Final stages of managing partner election debate see candidates focus on the future of the firm's US strategy and lockstep
October 25, 2015 at 08:08 PM
4 minute read
Linklaters' managing partner hustings have been dominated by debate over the firm's US strategy, a potential lockstep review and relations between management and partners.
The firm is in the process of selecting a new managing partner after Simon Davies, the current post holder, unexpectedly announced in July that he was stepping down early to take up a senior role at Lloyds Bank in January 2016. His exit will take place a year before his term was due to end.
The final three contenders in the race to succeed him have been touring Linklaters' offices to speak to partners about their vision for the firm.
Asia head Marc Harvey, banking head Gideon Moore and litigation head Michael Bennett have hit the road to drum up support for their priorities.
Legal Week understands that all three have been talking about similar issues including US strategy, the prospect of a review of the firm's partner remuneration structure and how to improve the relationship between management and the partnership.
Watching America
Success in the US is seen as key to the firm fulfilling its ambitions. A former partner says: "To be a credible international firm with ambition to be the best, you have to have proper resources in all the key financial markets, of which the US is fundamental."
Former partners say that there is recognition within Linklaters that other UK firms have stolen a march in America, either by merging with US firms or pursuing a more enthusiastic US hiring strategy.
Another former partner comments: "There must be a realisation that firms which have done US mergers, which would not previously have been considered as competitors, are getting lots of traction because of having a bigger US presence."
Another ex-Linklaters partner says that Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's drive to build up its US arm – where senior hires have included former partners of firms such as Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom – would prompt Linklaters to review its own approach. "They tend to measure themselves by each other, as they are very similar, if one has a strategy and the other hasn't, one will look at that strategy," he says.
One former partner says discussions about the firm's remuneration structure and its US strategy are linked.
"The strategy would be about how to get the best people out of the US firms into Linklaters." He adds:
"The challenge for Linklaters is do you break lockstep?"
Linklaters' lockstep runs from 10 to 25 points over 10 to 12 years. Reform of the system was previously discussed at the firm's April partner conference with ideas mooted including bringing in flexibility to better reward high-performing junior equity partners.
Another former partner also believes reviewing lockstep is key to the firm's international expansion. He says:
"If you have ambitions to be a global law firm then you are going to have to have some flexibility in your compensation."
He adds that lockstep has been a lingering issue for some time but the fact that Davies (pictured) failed to receive the required 75% majority in the 2012 partnership vote to confirm his reappointment and was only appointed after a second round of voting, hampered efforts at reform.
"The kerfuffle with Simon Davies' re-election put on hold any ability to have a meaningful conversation about compensation. After the non-election he didn't really have the mandate to run something quite as fundamental as a review of the lockstep," he says.
Relationship management
The need for debate over relations between management and the partnership is also a legacy of Davies' watch, which saw two restructurings, including a painful restructuring of the partnership in 2012 with 25 partners asked to leave, and 16 stripped of their equity status or asked to take a reduced profit share.
A former partner comments "it was a very odd situation where you have the owners of the business at odds with the management of the business".
Ex-partners though are optimistic about the future state of relations between management and the partnership, with one saying the candidates were "three super guys".
Once the hustings have finished the firm's partnership board will meet to select the successful candidate.
The board's choice will then be ratified by a vote of the partnership at the firm's November 17 partner conference.
Linklaters declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLosing its 'Sparkle'? Why Latham Has Faced a Stream of Exits in Europe, UK
6 minute readLinklaters, Slaughter and May and Eversheds Advise on Morrisons Property Deal
Ashurst Hires Partner-Led Italian Finance Team While Geradin Opens Nordic Hub in Helsinki
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Who Got The Work
Lane Powell shareholder Pilar C. French has entered an appearance for Penney OpCo LLC in a pending consumer class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 26 in Oregon District Court by Hattis & Lukacs, alleges that the company markets fictional discounts for certain products. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, is 6:24-cv-01414, Gamble v. Penney OpCo LLC.
Who Got The Work
Donald L. Carmelite and Coryn D. Hubbert of Marshall Dennehey have stepped in to defend the City of York, Detective Roland Comacho and Detective Lisa Daniels in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Middle District Court by Levin & Zeiger on behalf of Noel Matos Montalvo, seeks damages for the amount of time that Montalvo was incarcerated over five years for the exonerated killing of his common law wife. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson, is 1:24-cv-01459, Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
Who Got The Work
Joseph M. Englert, Brian E. Pumphrey and M. Laughlin Allen of McGuireWoods have entered appearances for Bank of America NA in a pending class action. The action was filed Aug. 26 in Georgia Northern District Court by Podhurst Orseck; Webb, Klase & Lemond; Crabtree & Auslander; and Morrison + Associates on behalf of the representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, a trust which contains residential real property. The suit accuses the defendant of overcharging the trust by selecting unnecessary and/or excessively priced insurance for the property. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr., is 1:24-cv-03780, Weinraub v. Bank of America, N.A.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250