Eversheds in talks with Foley & Lardner in bid to pull off long-awaited US merger
Eversheds in talks with US top 50 firm as it looks to complete its US strategy
October 30, 2015 at 08:03 AM
3 minute read
Eversheds is in talks with US firm Foley & Lardner as the UK firm continues its push to secure a merger across the Atlantic.
Legal Week understands that the pair – which have operated a referral relationship for at least four years – have been discussing a more formal combination in recent months.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin headquartered Foley has 17 offices across the US and nearly 900 lawyers. It has international offices in Brussels, Shanghai and Tokyo.
Sources close to the firm have also said Eversheds has been speaking to at least one other US firm in its hunt for a merger partner.
They indicated Eversheds had previously approached Chicago's Seyfarth Shaw among others, although Seyfarth denied any merger discussions had taken place.
A spokesperson for Seyfarth said: "We were never part of those talks and it would be inaccurate to suggest otherwise."
According to The American Lawyer, Foley is the 47th largest law firm in the US, with revenue of $665m (£434.63m). It has 849 lawyers and 153 equity partners.
By contrast Eversheds is the 13th largest law firm in the UK, with a 2014-15 revenue of £380.7m and an average profit per equity partner (PEP) of £741,000. The firm has 1,211 lawyers, and 332 partners, of which 118 are equity partners.
A combination between the two could create a firm with revenue of around £815m ($1.25bn), placing it on the fringe of the global top 20.
Eversheds has made no secret of its desire to merge with a US firm. Its partnership voted to back the strategy at the firm's June 2014 partner conference and its chief executive Bryan Hughes confirmed that the firm was looking to move to a shortlist of two to three potential merger candidates by early 2015.
The firm, under the stewardship of Hughes, has stated that its aim is to be global by 2020.
An Eversheds spokesperson said that the firm's intention to "establish a presence in the United States" was "well documented" and that the firm's "investigations continue in this respect".
He added: "A number of options remain open to us and until we are clear on the way forward it would be wholly inappropriate to comment further."
Eversheds is also thought to be interested in growing domestically, with its London corporate practice an area that it is particularly interested in strengthening. There have previously been suggestions that an approach was made to Addleshaw Goddard, although both firms declined to comment on this.
A spokesperson for Addleshaws said that there was nothing they wished to say as the firm "won't comment on speculation and rumour".
Foley & Lardner did not respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllALN Expands into Ghana, Tapping Into Booming Gold Market and West African Growth
3 minute readJones Day Names New Practice Leaders in Brussels, Latin America and the US
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250