Linklaters highest-paid partner's remuneration jumps to £3.2m
Magic circle firm's top earner took home 33% more in 2014-15 than the year before, according to its latest set of accounts
December 01, 2015 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Linklaters highest paid director received £3.2m in remuneration in the 2014-15 financial year, the firm's latest set of accounts show.
This marks a 33% jump from the preceding year when the firm's top earner took home £2.4m.
The firm's turnover in the year to 30 April 2015 increased by 1.12%, to £1.26bn, up from £1.25bn, while its pre-tax profit rose 6.33% to £420.12m up from £395.11m.
After tax that left £402.57m for remuneration of members and profit sharing, an increase of 6.8% on the previous years' figure of £376.79m.
Writing in the accounts senior partner Robert Elliott said the firm, which has offices across Europe, Asia, the Middle East and the Americas, was affected by currency fluctuations and its turnover was 5% higher than the preceding year on a constant currency basis.
He said: "Demand was strong across all our practice and sector groups but, in particular, in 2014-15 the firm has benefited from improved volumes in M&A and continued growth in contentious and non-contentious regulatory work, with dispute resolution and arbitration also being particularly active."
The firm's staff numbers stayed broadly stable with 2,387 practising lawyers in 2014-15, compared to 2,325 lawyers the year before. The firm's staff costs rose from £597.2m in 2014 to £617.26m in 2015.
Linklaters average number of partners across the year was 287, compared to 289 in 2013-14.
In July the firm announced that its average profit per equity partner for 2015 was £1.42m, although its highest paid partner in 2015 received £3.2m in profit and remuneration.
According to the accounts, partners receive between seven and ten profit sharing units (parts) on becoming an equity partner. This increases by 1.5 parts per year to a maximum of 25, although this is weighted differently in certain jurisdictions to reflect the reduced rates charged in certain legal markets.
The accounts also said the total profit and remuneration payable to a partner can substantially exceed that of a member on full profit entitlement when compensation for costs such as tax or accommodation, payable to members on secondment, are taken into account, or because of payments associated with joining or retiring from the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Strengthens Tokyo Office With Partner Hire From Big Four Japanese Firm AMT
K&L Gates Duo Leaves to Reunite with Former Leader at Sreenivasan Chambers
Clifford Chance Among Advisers as Prince Harry Newspaper Hearing Begins
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250