Social background determines career prospects, say almost nine out of ten law students
Survey of law students finds strong feelings on influence of upbringing on career prospects, as law firms take new approaches to improve diversity
December 10, 2015 at 11:24 AM
3 minute read
The majority of law students think their social background will have an impact on their future in law, a new survey has revealed, with almost nine in ten of the belief that their upbringing will have an influence on on their career.
The survey, carried out by Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) and Legal Week, aimed to find out the opinions of law students on two of the most vital issues shaping the future of the legal profession – social diversity and new routes into a career in law.
Eighty-six percent of respondents to the survey said they believed their social background could be a factor on their career prospects, including 36% who said their background will impact their future "to a large degree".
Linked to this, the students questioned were also largely in favour of law firms recruiting with a 'CV blind' policy, with 44% believing this approach could go some way in improving socio-economic diversity, and 23% believing CV blindness would help "very much".
Commenting on the results, Alan Demirkaya (pictured), graduate recruitment and trainee manager at BLP, said: "These results underline the findings of a survey from BLP and Legal Week last year which revealed many students believe that their background will have a detrimental impact on their career.
"Steps such as our implementation of contextual recruitment with Rare, plus other such approaches, can go some way in improving socio-economic diversity. Contextual recruitment will mean we better understand our applicants and their potential, resulting in us hiring talented trainees for our firm regardless of their background. It's encouraging to see that students have faith in these changes."
New routes into a legal career are increasingly in evidence across law firms and this is a trend which the students of today are well aware of – 60% of respondents to the survey believe firms will have a more diverse range of legal roles in the future, including paralegals, legal executives and apprentices.
The importance of diverse skillsets has certainly been recognised recently as the world of law evolves and modernises. The survey reveals that nearly as many law students think soft skills – such as adaptability, team working and time management – should be prioritised by firms as those who believe traditional/mainstream educational qualifications are the most important factors.
Almost two thirds of respondents (65%) also expect to see more non-lawyers taking up management and senior roles in the law firms of the future.
The lawyers of tomorrow recognise that, as law firms evolve, additional commercial and non-legal qualifications are likely to be beneficial. Although the majority of those students surveyed cited they are happy that legal qualifications are all they need (44%), this was closely followed by 35% of students who said they would consider leadership and management qualifications to further their career, as well as 32% who would turn to project and process management qualifications to help them stand out.
Demirkaya added: "With the Legal Services Act and other changes, the legal market is evolving, and the responses to this survey show that students are recognising the increased value of so-called soft skills to further their careers."
This article was commissioned for the Turning Points hub, an online career development resource from Legal Week in association with BLP.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250