AIM lawyers blame commodities slump for collapse in listings in 2015
The number of initial public offerings on the AIM market in 2015 was the lowest since the height of the financial crisis
January 07, 2016 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
Ongoing low commodities prices was behind a fall in AIM market listings to their lowest level since the height of the financial crisis, lawyers in the market have said.
Last year the AIM market saw its lowest number of admissions since 2009.
According to London Stock Exchange data published this week, 61 companies were admitted to AIM in 2015, the lowest number since the height of the financial crisis in 2009 when 36 companies were admitted.
However, the total market capitalisation of the companies listed increased from last year, from £71.414bn to £73.076bn.
Commodities crash
Fieldfisher corporate partner Neil Matthews puts the fall in new listings down to the travails of the resource sector due to a slump in commodities prices – Brent Crude hitting an 11-year low this week as it inched below $35 a barrel.
"The main factor is that resources stocks have been very badly hit and that sector has been the mainstay of AIM over the last ten years," he says.
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co corporate head Sunil Kakkad (pictured) also points to the commodities slump as the reason for the dearth of initial public offerings (IPOs) on AIM in 2015.
He adds: "Similarly if you look at the number of companies that have left AIM the majority of those have been in the resources sector."
There were 121 delistings in 2015, of which only 4 were transfers to the main market, and the total number of companies on the market fell from 1,104 in 2014 to 1,044 in 2015.
However, DLA Piper's EMEA capital markets group head, Alex Tamlyn, argues that the decrease in the number of companies listed on the market is not necessarily a bad thing.
"We have come down from 1,700 companies at the apogee to around 1,000," he says.
"In cutting out the dead wood the market is actually strengthening its brand and making it clear to the international marketplace that it is after companies of quality with fast growth potential," he adds.
Bright spots
While the total amount of money raised on AIM fell from £5.868bn in 2014 to £5.462bn in 2015, there was an increased amount of secondary capital raising activity.
Kakkad says: "The secondary issues market has been very helpful throughout the last 12 months, which has very much been a feature of the work we have seen."
Secondary fundraising accounted for £4.304bn in 2015, up from £3.269bn in 2014.
2015 has shown that there is money available, despite uncertainty in certain markets, for good quality companies
Tamlyn adds: "2015 has shown that there is money available, despite uncertainty in certain markets, for good quality companies."
Partners cite areas such as life sciences, technology and retail as bright spots and are positive about the pipeline of work for the first two quarters of 2016.
Matthews says: "We have been particularly active ourselves in the life sciences space, we have worked on a number of IPOs in that sector in the last 18 months and we continue to do so."
For DLA Piper the technology sector was particularly active, as Tamlyn explains: "For us technology has been the strongest sector and we have seen activity in the online retail space as well."
December was a strong month for both primary and secondary capital raising on the AIM market last year with seven new market entrants, accounting for £318m of new capital raised and a further £319m raised in secondary issues. Partners are hopeful that the strong end to the year will translate to a positive start to 2016.
"We've got IPOs in train at the moment so the first half of 2016 should be comparable with the second half of 2015 which was the stronger half of last year," Tamlyn says.
Travers Smith corporate finance partner Richard Spedding was also confident about his firms IPO pipeline in 2016.
"Over the last quarter we have seen a healthy number of companies position themselves for a Q1 16 AIM IPO – typically based on positive test marketing. Good management teams with clear business plans and growth stories remain attractive."
Kakkad confirms that Wragges' too is currently working on IPOs, which he expects to see the light of day in early 2016, and he is hopeful that the pattern will translate to a stronger year on the AIM market in 2016.
"The pipeline of work that we have suggests to us that we will see more new companies coming to the market than we did last year," he says.
He concludes: "We are quite optimistic about the next 12 months, there are always dark clouds on the horizon in terms of the wider macro-economic indicators but at the moment we don't feel that there is a significant cause for alarm."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Law Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 4Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 5Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250