Asia partners fear further price pressure following China market volatility
Suspension of trading reignites concern that complex capital markets work will dry up
January 14, 2016 at 07:07 PM
4 minute read
Partners in Asia fear fee levels for capital markets work could fall and that firms could be forced to scale back their presence in the region as a result of the instability in Chinese share prices.
Chinese stock markets have experienced significant volatility over the first two weeks of January, with trading suspended last week after shares plunged more than 7% as the government weakened the value of the yuan to a five year low. The Hong Kong Hang Seng index also fell 3% as it felt the knock-on effects.
Partners warn that the instability is reigniting the concerns prompted by last August's stock market crash.
With capital markets work expected to continue bearing the brunt of the volatility, firms which have made significant investments into the practice could face further questions about their viability in the region.
On matters such as IPOs, which require large teams, in particular the risk is that many are left at their desk without much work to do. Furthermore, as one Hong Kong based partner points out, less work could mean more fee pressure to win the remaining mandates forcing firms to further slash already pressed prices.
Things are likely to be slow at least for the short to medium term
"When there is a less work around what you see is people working at lower rates to keep their teams busy," says one Asia partner.
DLA Piper's Singapore managing partner John Viverito adds: "Current market conditions are a bit concerning. It seems that things are likely to be slow at least for the short to medium term."
Shearman & Sterling China and Asia capital markets head Colin Law says that the presence of large underworked teams in the region, as a result of an overinvestment by firms in capital markets in 2010 and 2011, increases the likelihood of firms slimming down their numbers or leaving Asia all together.
"Capital markets is increasingly commoditised with increased fee pressure, but at the same time there are only a handful of law firms which have been broadly accepted by major financial institutions," he says.
He adds that he feels his firm is well placed to weather the storm. "If we stay focused on clients such as banks, which have high expectations on quality, we are not seeing as much fee pressure as one would see if you target only the lesser transactions," Law says.
Silver linings
Others are more hopeful about the prospects for the M&A market in 2016 arguing that while capital markets will be hit, mainstream M&A will not suffer as much, allowing firms with a broader corporate remit to carry on without too much concern.
"If companies are on growth strategies in Europe and the US then I think that will contribute to continued M&A activity in our region. In some ways the equity market volatility is a bit of a distraction," says Bakers & McKenzie Asia corporate head David Fleming.
If companies are on growth strategies in Europe and the US then I think that will contribute to continued M&A activity
In addition, many are eyeing an uptick in restructuring work as vulture funds looking for distressed debt and assets are also expected to provide a source of work for many firms. However, the extent to which these can make up for the capital markets deficit remains to be seen.
"We may see an increase in distressed M&A this year, although there have been a few times since 2008 when a number of advisers have prepared for a cycle of distressed M&A and it hasn't really occurred," adds Fleming.
"Most multinational acquirers are in reasonable financial condition. Credit is still relatively available and cheap. Corporates are also seeing the benefits of restructuring and fine tuning," he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOsborne Clarke makes move into China via tie-up with new Shanghai firm
HSF agrees settlement with eight Australian partners who quit to join White & Case
DLA Piper makes up 46 to partnership around the world as London promotions halve
Trending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 4Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 5Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250