Former Holman Fenwick Willan partner banned from practice after charging clients for his holidays
Konstantinos Adamantopoulos has left Holman Fenwick after SDT decision which found him guilty of charging clients for private holidays
March 31, 2016 at 05:52 AM
2 minute read
Former Holman Fenwick Willan partner Konstantinos Adamantopoulos has been banned from any UK legal practice after the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found he charged clients for his own holidays and other personal expenses.
Adamantopoulos left the firm in December after a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decision found him to have acted "without integrity in respect of three different matters and had been at least objectively dishonest," relating to his time as legacy Hammonds Brussels managing partner. The full details of the judgement were published this week.
Between 2007 and 2009, while working at Hammonds, he charged clients for private holidays in Greece and Swiss ski resort Zermatt.
Competition lawyer Adamantopoulos has been made subject to a section 43 order, which means he is unable to be employed by a solicitors' firm in England or Wales without the permission of the Law Society.
Adamantopoulos, who specialises in EU law, was also ordered to pay £65,000 of costs.
He resigned in 2010 after an internal review by the firm found issues relating to his operation of the firm's drawings policy.
He joined Holman Fenwick as partner in its Brussels office in 2011, after spending time as a consultant following his resignation from legacy Squire Patton Boggs in 2010.
According to Companies House filings Adamantopoulos, who specialises in EU trade and competition law, left Holman Fenwick's partnership on 10 December 2015.
He had previously quit legacy Hammonds in 2006, before rescinding his resignation. His initial resignation was related to the introduction of partnership measures restricting when equity partners could hand in their notice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Walmart Ordered to End ‘Abusive Practices’ By Mexican Antitrust Authority
O'Melveny Secures Global Clearances as Korean Air-Asiana Merger is Finally Completed
Big Law Firms Help Vodafone-Three Merger Clear Major Competition Hurdle
Canada’s Antitrust Watchdog Sues Google For Billions Over Ad Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
