Freshfields knocked off Asia M&A top spot
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has lost its top spot for M&A deal value in Q1 2016 after holding the position in Asia for all of 2015
April 05, 2016 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has lost its place at top of the Asia Pacific M&A league table, Mergermarket figures for Q1 reveal.
The magic circle firm took pole position in the ranking of firms by total deal value for all four quarters of 2015 but has fallen to 18th place for the first three months of this year. In the first quarter the firm worked on $8.87bn (£6.3bn) of deals.
Freshfields was displaced from the top of the league table for deal value by Chinese firm Fangda Partners which topped the table with deals totalling $57.25bn (£40.4bn) over the period. The PRC firm has climbed to first place from 24th in the table for the same period last year.
Davis Polk and Wardwell came second for deal value with $57bn (£40.1bn) worth of deals across eight mandates.
White & Case has also climbed significantly up the table rising to third place this year with $51.85bn (£36.5bn) against 153rd in Q1 2015.
Lowest in two years
In total 700 deals were conducted in the region – excluding Japan – in Q1 2016, worth $131.8bn (£92.8bn) down 34.2% on 1Q 2015. It is the lowest quarterly deal value since Q1 2014 which had a total of $114.8bn (£80.8bn). Despite the fall the region's share of the global deal total was 22.1% – the fifth highest share on record – due to weak deal levels across the globe.
Freshfields' Asia managing partner, Robert Ashworth says: "The somewhat slower first quarter likely reflects the volatility in Chinese equity markets around the middle of last year." He argues that all market stats tend to lag slightly behind the experience on the ground due, in part, to the time it takes deals to become public.
King & Wood Mallesons topped the rankings for deal volume in Q1 2016, as it did in Q1 2015, acting on 26 deals with a total value of $36.24bn (£25.2bn). Herbert Smith Freehills and Chinese firm Zhong Lun took joint second place with 19 deals each.
Mumbai firm Khaitan & Co has climbed up the rankings for deal volume to fourth place from 31st over the same period last year.
There is uncertainty everywhere for different reasons
There is agreement among those in the market that the drop in deal volume, both regionally and globally, is to be expected with a number of large ongoing economic and political events.
"The global deal volume figure is down and I think that that is not a huge surprise as there is uncertainty everywhere for different reasons," says Herbert Smith Freehills Asia corporate head Austin Sweeny.
"In Europe you have got Brexit and continued economic problems in Southern Europe. In Asia you have got questions over a China slow down, which I think are beginning now to have an effect and some of the local markets continue to be a bit depressed."
Outbound on the up
However, outbound deals from China have increased significantly from Q1 2015, with the figure up 346.1% over the same period this year. In total 83 deals accounted for $81.7bn (£57.5bn) worth of outbound activity, despite the uncertainty in the Chinese markets – the figure was only 17% behind 2015′s total outbound deals value.
China National Chemical Corporation's takeover of Syngenta AG for $45.8bn (£32.2bn) was the biggest deal globally of the quarter with mandates on the mega-deal going to, among others, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Cravath Swaine & Moore, Clifford Chance and White & Case.
They want to have more market share and we will see a lot of activity coming from China
"The outbound investment from China has been increasing and I think this year it will continue to grow," said White & Case China corporate head, Alex Zhang. "They want to have more market share in the US and Europe and we will see a lot of activity coming from China – not just technology and manufacturing but also financial services."
Conversely inbound investment to Asia has fallen dramatically – down 75.9% on Q1 2015- to $7.1bn (£5bn).
Japan has also seen an increase in activity with aggregate deal value back to pre-global financial crisis levels. Q1 2016 saw a total of $14.8bn (£10.4bn) worth of deals – the highest figure since Q1 2008 $17.3bn (£12.2bn).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPérez-Llorca, Deloitte Legal and White & Case behind €1B Green Deal in Spain
South Africa Regulator’s Staffing Problems Leave High-Stakes M&A Deals in Limbo
4 minute readGoodwin, Conyers, A&O Shearman Act on $800M China Biotech Sale
Trending Stories
- 1'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
- 2Attorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 3$1.9M Settlement Approved in Class Suit Over Vacant Property Fees
- 4Former Wamco Exec Charged With $600M 'Cherry-Picking' Fraud
- 5Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250