Shell nearly halves its global legal panel
Shell has cut its global legal panel from 11 advisers to just six in a review that saw the company look at over 200 firms
April 19, 2016 at 05:02 AM
2 minute read
Shell has slashed its legal panel from eleven firms to just six advisers the oil giant announced today.
The company's revised main roster, the first since its merger with rival BG Group earlier this year, is accompanied by 12 regional panels with up to five firms on each.
Magic circle firms Allen & Overy (A&O) and Clifford Chance (CC) have both secured coveted places on the panel alongside Eversheds, Norton Rose Fulbright, Baker & McKenzie and Reed Smith.
The six month review process was led by Canada-based associate general counsel for disputes, strategy and coordination Gordon McCue.
McCue reviewed over 200 firms in order to reach the final six. The panel will be in place for four years with rates being reviewed in May 2018.
Shell legal director Donny Ching said: "The new firms bring with them a combination of strong legal experience and expertise, global reach, and flexibility with regards to cost arrangements that will help Shell achieve a higher standard of performance for our organisation, maintaining a strong and growing long-term position in the competitive environments in which we operate."
Shell last reviewed its panel in 2013, handing roles on the 11-strong roster to Allen & Overy, Baker & McKenzie, Clifford Chance, Norton Rose and Simmons & Simmons among others.
Each of the six panel firms on the new roster has been appointed a "relationship general counsel" who is one of Shell's eight divisional general counsel.
Shell has retained the ability to invite off-panel firms to pitch for specific pieces of work.
A Shell spokesperson said: "Shell operates in 70 countries around the world so we are going to retain the flexibility to engage with the right lawyers in the right time with the right issue."
Firms were asked to participate in an online rate auction, despite the company moving away from an hourly fee structure to alternative fee arrangements.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimmons & Simmons Make Waves with 'Legal Personhood' Initiative for Whales
2 minute readLeigh Day Cleared of Wrongdoing in £55M Shell Settlement with Nigeria
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP for Role in Brazil Mining Disaster Begins
Trending Stories
- 111th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 2Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 3'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 4Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250