Dealmaker: Travers Smith's Adrian West on Ridley Scott, McDonald's and his love of lycra
Having just advised on Hotel Chocolat's float, the Travers Smith corporate partner is this week's Dealmaker.
May 09, 2016 at 08:03 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Why did you become a lawyer?
I had ideas about joining the Army but an illness stopped that. Even as a student I was interested in business and the stock market, so I decided that I wanted to work in the City. A law degree and a recommendation from a friend at university (now a partner in our Paris office) led to a place on the Travers Smith summer scheme. I enjoyed the work and the atmosphere and decided that a career as a solicitor would suit me. I joined Travers Smith as a trainee and 15 years later, I'm still here.
What advice would you give to younger lawyers starting out?
Make sure that you find an area of law that interests you. If you are interested in what you are doing, you will enjoy it and be successful.
Worst day on the job?
A client I had worked with for six or seven years went into administration for reasons completely beyond its control. It was a sad moment seeing a client I had worked with for all those years end up in that position.
Best day on the job?
When you have been working hard on a deal and it finally signs – it's a moment of relief and excitement and an opportunity to go home and get some rest. And then there are the completion dinners, which can be great fun. As a junior associate, I met Ridley Scott at a completion dinner. It was shaping up to be a great night until I realised that he did not want to hear my views on Gladiator.
As a junior associate I met Ridley Scott at a completion dinner. It was shaping up to be a great night until I realised that he did not want to hear my views on Gladiator
What's your strongest characteristic...and worst trait?
According to my associates and trainees I am very approachable, which I guess is a strong characteristic. But I have terrible handwriting! I frustrate people when I hand them mark-ups and they can't read any of it.
It's midnight and you're in the office for the night. Where's your takeaway from?
I don't tend to eat in the office but I often pop into McDonald's at Waterloo on the way home.
What annoys you about the legal profession?
When negotiating documents, debating what is or is not ‘the market position'. It frustrates me because our clients are paying us to be creative and find solutions.
Strangest request from a client?
Being asked to host a client wine-tasting dinner when the wine expert couldn't make it. I managed to bluff my way through the evening and I think the clients enjoyed it – the wine at least.
Most memorable deal?
The IPO of Hostelworld at the end of last year. I led a cross-departmental team where our corporate finance team worked closely with our private equity, commercial and tax teams. It was great seeing it all come together, making sure everyone kept a smile on their face and delivering for the client and the other advisers. We had worked on a lot of IPOs in the past couple of years and a number had ended up as sales, so it was pleasing to get that one from the start to the finish line.
Favourite item of clothing?
I do get ridiculed for my love of Lycra. I can often be seen cycling around the Surrey countryside in my Travers Smith cycling top.
Why did you become a lawyer?
I had ideas about joining the Army but an illness stopped that. Even as a student I was interested in business and the stock market, so I decided that I wanted to work in the City. A law degree and a recommendation from a friend at university (now a partner in our Paris office) led to a place on the Travers Smith summer scheme. I enjoyed the work and the atmosphere and decided that a career as a solicitor would suit me. I joined Travers Smith as a trainee and 15 years later, I'm still here.
What advice would you give to younger lawyers starting out?
Make sure that you find an area of law that interests you. If you are interested in what you are doing, you will enjoy it and be successful.
Worst day on the job?
A client I had worked with for six or seven years went into administration for reasons completely beyond its control. It was a sad moment seeing a client I had worked with for all those years end up in that position.
Best day on the job?
When you have been working hard on a deal and it finally signs – it's a moment of relief and excitement and an opportunity to go home and get some rest. And then there are the completion dinners, which can be great fun. As a junior associate, I met Ridley Scott at a completion dinner. It was shaping up to be a great night until I realised that he did not want to hear my views on Gladiator.
As a junior associate I met Ridley Scott at a completion dinner. It was shaping up to be a great night until I realised that he did not want to hear my views on Gladiator
What's your strongest characteristic...and worst trait?
According to my associates and trainees I am very approachable, which I guess is a strong characteristic. But I have terrible handwriting! I frustrate people when I hand them mark-ups and they can't read any of it.
It's midnight and you're in the office for the night. Where's your takeaway from?
I don't tend to eat in the office but I often pop into McDonald's at Waterloo on the way home.
What annoys you about the legal profession?
When negotiating documents, debating what is or is not ‘the market position'. It frustrates me because our clients are paying us to be creative and find solutions.
Strangest request from a client?
Being asked to host a client wine-tasting dinner when the wine expert couldn't make it. I managed to bluff my way through the evening and I think the clients enjoyed it – the wine at least.
Most memorable deal?
The IPO of Hostelworld at the end of last year. I led a cross-departmental team where our corporate finance team worked closely with our private equity, commercial and tax teams. It was great seeing it all come together, making sure everyone kept a smile on their face and delivering for the client and the other advisers. We had worked on a lot of IPOs in the past couple of years and a number had ended up as sales, so it was pleasing to get that one from the start to the finish line.
Favourite item of clothing?
I do get ridiculed for my love of Lycra. I can often be seen cycling around the Surrey countryside in my Travers Smith cycling top.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250