DLA Piper's Yorkshire offices to feel the brunt of support staff cull
International firm's Yorkshire heartland to be hardest hit in redundancy process that could see 200 support jobs axed
May 11, 2016 at 10:20 AM
3 minute read
DLA Piper's Sheffield and Leeds offices are expected to bear the brunt of the firm's cuts to its UK support staff.
Earlier today, the firm announced it is set to cut up to 200 support jobs from its UK offices – the equivalent of 18% of its 1,100 UK support staff.
The firm's chief operations officer (COO), Andrew Darwin (pictured), said that while the review will affect each of the firm's seven UK offices, it will likely hit the firm's offices in its Yorkshire heartland particularly hard.
Speaking to Legal Week, he said: "It affects each of the seven UK offices. The larger cuts will be in Leeds and Sheffield as that's where our current shared services are largely based."
The firm said that 85 jobs are at risk in its Yorkshire offices, while 47 jobs are at risk in its London office.
DLA is automating some back-office processes and transferring others to its shared services centre in Warsaw. Its existing IT support centre in Leeds is expected to be particularly hard hit by the job cuts.
However, Darwin argued that: "Cost savings are not the core part of this." He said the "main principle" behind the review was "to make the support for the lawyers as effective as possible".
But he conceded that: "Without wanting to shy away from the issue, you are looking to be as cost-effective as you can be; there is an element of trying to get the right combination of capability and cost-effectiveness."
The consultation process with staff will kick off on 31 May and run until the end of July.
Darwin said the redundancy package staff are to be offered will be "well designed and generous" and that staff affected "will be supported as far as we can".
The review that resulted in the current consultation started two years ago and has been led in the international arm of DLA Piper by COO Darwin, and in the US partnership by his counterpart Bob Bratt.
Darwin said: "We had done all the sensible things that organisations like ours do and we wanted to make a stepchange in the way we provide services."
DLA was advised on the review process by management consulting firm McKinsey & Company as the firm "wanted to access best practice and not just from the legal sector", Darwin said.
DLA Piper launched a previous review in 2012, which affected up to 251 lawyers and backroom staff.
That long-running review resulted in the closure of the firm's Glasgow office, with the loss of 45 staff.
In 2014, the firm confirmed that 69 of the 116 support jobs that were put at risk of redundancy as part of the firm-wide review had been axed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
A&O Shearman Hires Knowledge and Innovation Lead from Pérez-Llorca
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
