More than a third of partners at large firms privately educated
Survey finds that former students of fee-paying schools make up a disproportionally large section of law firm partnerships
May 18, 2016 at 06:53 AM
3 minute read
More than a third of partners at major UK firms went to a private school, compared to just 7% of the general population, a report by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has found.
The report, published yesterday (17 May), reveals that 37% of partners in firms with more than 50 partners went to fee-paying schools.
Even in smaller firms, privately educated people make up 23% of partners.
The survey found that across the profession as a whole, 22% of lawyers went to private school.
The report concludes that law firms still have a way to go in improving the diversity of their staff.
Chief executive of the SRA Paul Philip said: "Encouraging diversity in legal services is not about ticking boxes. It is of course the right thing to do but it also helps to make sure the sector is as competitive as possible.
"There should not be any barriers stopping the best people – whatever their background – thriving in law."
The report is the third survey by the SRA on diversity in the profession. It surveyed more than 9,000 law firms in England and Wales and 170,000 people working in them.
It states: "Although the legal sector is increasingly diverse, more still needs to be done."
The survey also looked at gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity and social background.
It found that women make up 47% of lawyers across the profession, but that they make up just 33% of partners.
This represents an increase of two percentage points since the SRA's previous diversity survey, which took place in 2014 and found 31% of partners were women.
Meanwhile, just 14% of partners surveyed by the SRA identified as black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME).
BAME people are still underrepresented in the profession, where they make up just 2% of lawyers – compared to 3% of the working population.
In 2011, a number of elite firms including Allen & Overy and Hogan Lovells founded PRIME, the diversity initiative designed to provide work experience in the legal profession to schoolchildren from less privileged backgrounds.
Earlier this year, a report by the National Foundation for Educational Research ran an assessment of the initiative and found that two thirds of the students surveyed – who had all undergone work experience placements at law firms – said they had not had any further contact with the firms since their work experience had ended.
The report recommends that firms now need to consider "manageable and effective" ways of maintaining this contact with students following their work experience.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250