Bird & Bird trims sector groups as it reviews relationship firms
The international firm has cut its sector groups from 11 to eight as it reviews its global relationship firms
May 19, 2016 at 07:04 PM
3 minute read
Bird & Bird has cut its sector groups from 11 to eight as it reviews its relationship firms across the globe.
The international firm has rationalised its sector groups into broader areas as a reaction to changes in the spread of industries across its client base.
The new groups are: aviation and defence; automotive; energy and utilities; financial services; healthcare and life sciences; media, entertainment and sport; retail and consumer; technology and communications.
The changes mean the firm's aviation group and its aerospace, defence and security group have merged, while its food and beverage group has broadened into the retail and consumer group.
Meanwhile, the firm is currently undertaking a review of its global best friend relationships.
The firm is reviewing the firms it uses in each jurisdiction to ensure its partners are directing work to the same local firms.
Bird & Bird chief executive David Kerr told Legal Week: "We have a large global footprint but where we're not in a particular country we like to have strong relationships with firms that can cover what we need in other markets, particularly the bigger ones. This includes Africa and America, as well as Asia-Pacific countries."
The review of the firm's relationship firms is undertaken by the management team for each area, with individual partners involved depending on their experience.
Kerr stressed that the firm's international capabilities are always closely looked at.
He said: "We put a lot of time into it and have a lot of people engaged in making it happen."
While Kerr said that the firm "would never say no" to the idea of a full merger with a US firm to increase its stateside capabilities, there are no present plans to do so.
He added: "We've managed to keep and evolve our core strategy for the last 20 years and are keen to hold true to that."
Bird & Bird last made significant steps to broaden its global offering two years ago.
In November 2014, the firm converted its cooperation agreement with Australian firm Truman Hoyle into a full merger, after entering the Korean market through a non-exclusive partnership with Seoul-based outfit Hwang Mok Park.
It also entered Indonesia in the same year, via two cooperation agreements with domestic firms K&K Advocates and Nurjadin Sumono Mulyadi & Partners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird trims sector groups as it reviews relationship firms
Bird & Bird triples partner promotions as Watson Farley and Ince also announce new partners
Trending Stories
- 1The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
- 2People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 4Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 5Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
