Clifford Chance appears in court in Saudi office licence case
Courts to decide whether CC will have to reapply for its licence in the Kingdom – a process that could take up to two years
May 23, 2016 at 01:03 AM
3 minute read
Clifford Chance (CC) has appeared in the Saudi courts for a complete rehearing of its Saudi office licence case, which could, it is understood, take up to two years.
The courts will weigh up whether CC and other professional services firms licensed in the Kingdom on the same legal basis, will have to reapply for their licences.
CC has been embroiled in an investigation over its office licence in Riyadh since it was granted it in 2013. It was the first international law firm to set up a mixed local and foreign law firm partnership with its longstanding ally in Riyadh, Al-Jadaan. The branch opened for business in 2014.
However, shortly after CC gained its licence in 2013, a former Al-Jadaan associate appealed against the decision and commenced proceedings in the Saudi courts.
The associate claimed that the Ministry of Commerce & Industry (MoCI), a government body, had acted unlawfully in licensing CC under the Professional Companies Regulations.
The court case has now been returned from the Court of Appeal to the lower court for a complete rehearing.
The Court of Appeal has given an advisory, non-binding opinion of its view of the law. It has suggested all foreign Saudi-owned professional companies should be licensed by the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority, in addition to MoCI.
CC attended the latest hearing at the lower court on 9 May. Documents were exchanged and the court reserved the case for its study.
The next hearing is scheduled for 8 August 2016.
The current Saudi court system is composed of a Supreme Judicial Council, Courts of Appeal and First-Instance Courts or lower courts (General Courts and Summary Courts).
The majority of international law firms operate in Saudi through local associations and therefore are not under scrutiny.
Clyde & Co is one of the few other fully integrated offices in Riyadh. It opened the office last year headed by Abdulaziz Al-Bosaily, whose law office has been closely associated with Clyde & Co for more than six years.
However, it is understood that it is not currently affected by the case involving CC.
CC currently has five Riyadh partners after one, Abdulaziz Al-Abduljabber, left the firm in December. The courts' review of CC's licence is unrelated to his departure.
It is understood that the magic circle firm intends to keep its Riyadh office whatever the outcome of the court case and will do whatever it takes to comply with the relevant regulations.
CC declined to comment and the MoCI did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel continues City recruitment with hire of Clifford Chance tax disputes head
Clifford Chance and Linklaters to launch 24-hour Brexit operations rooms
Clifford Chance and Linklaters lead the way on gas network deal
Clifford Chance and Linklaters lead the way on gas network deal
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250