Addleshaw Goddard and Hunton & Williams in merger talks: UK firm's management to talk to partners
UK firm in talks to combine with US firm Hunton & Williams, with discussions going on for several months
May 24, 2016 at 08:04 AM
3 minute read
Addleshaw Goddard managing partner John Joyce is expected to talk to partners later today, as it emerges that the firm is in merger discussions with US player Hunton & Williams.
Legal Week understands that Joyce is set to speak to partners at around 6pm tonight, with the US talks on the agenda for discussion.
The call comes after Joyce is understood to have visited the US last week to speak to Hunton, alongside a delegation that included his executive team and Addleshaws' divisional managing partners.
Legal Week understands that the two firms have been in discussions for around nine months and, if successful, a merger between the pair would create a firm with combined revenue of around £554m and more than 1,300 lawyers.
In a statement, an Addleshaws' spokesperson said: "We've said before that we will never comment on speculation about mergers and that remains our position so we have nothing to say."
He added: "Increasing our scale and coverage is something we constantly consider."
The talks represent Addleshaws' second set of merger discussions in the past 12 months, after an unsuccessful round of talks with Scottish firm Maclay Murray & Spens was called off earlier this year.
Addleshaws posted revenue of £192.5m in 2014-15, which represented a 12% increase on its previous year's result. Its average profit per equity (PEP) partner climbed 25.3% to £491,000. In 2014-15 it had 609 lawyers and 173 partners, of which 96 were equity partners.
In contrast to Addleshaws' performance, Hunton posted one of the biggest revenue declines in Legal Week sister publication The American Lawyer's annual Am Law 100 rankings, with turnover dropping 7% to $528m (£361.6m) in 2015, making it the 62nd largest firm by revenue in. Its PEP stood at $950,000 (£650,039), down 5%.
The firm has 696 lawyers, with 167 equity partners.
Virginia-headquartered Hunton has six partners in its London office, led by data privacy partner Bridget Treacy.
The firm has 13 offices across the US, alongside international outposts in Brussels, Beijing, Tokyo and Bangkok.
Addleshaws has offices in London, Leeds and Manchester, as well as international offices in Dubai, Hong Kong, Oman, Qatar and Singapore. It has a presence in Tokyo through an alliance with a Japanese firm.
Addleshaws is currently consulting partners on potential changes to the firm's partnership deed, which will make it more difficult for partners to leave.
The deed change would restrict the number who could leave in one year to seven and introduce 'bad leavers' clauses, which would hit departing partners' equity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman Hires Knowledge and Innovation Lead from Pérez-Llorca
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250