Shearman & Sterling announces 8% salary hike for newly qualified UK lawyers
The US firm has announced salary increases across its associate scale
May 27, 2016 at 06:06 AM
2 minute read
Shearman & Sterling has hiked its newly qualified (NQ) salary rate in London from £88,000 to £95,0000 – a jump of 8%.
The US firm has announced salary increases for all of its UK junior, mid-level and senior associates.
Shearman operates a performance-based salary system, with salaries rising across all of the bands.
Junior associate salaries will run from £95,000 at the base level, while the starting salary for mid-level associates with three and a half years' post-qualification experience (PQE) has been raised to £126,000, from £115,000.
Senior associates with at least six and a half years' PQE have seen the starting salary for their band rising to £156,000, from £146,000.
All of the salary increases took effect from 1 May 2016.
The firm has also introduced an agile working policy for its London-based counsel and associates.
In a statement, the firm said that it has had "an informal remote working arrangement in place in its London office for a number of years" and that the formalising of the policy follows internal consultation with its staff.
The policy does not specify the number of days that associates and counsel can work remotely and lawyers must obtain authorisation from their line manager.
Nick Buckworth, London managing partner at Shearman, said: "In a recent internal survey, our staff clearly told us that having the ability to work flexibly was of increasing importance. We are pleased to have put in place new processes that enable our team to work in a more agile way and we have the full support of our partners to ensure this is a success."
Last year, Shearman & Sterling increased the salary rates for its first-year and second-year UK trainees. The salaries of first-year trainees rose 15.4%, from £39,000 to £45,000, and the salaries of second-year trainees increased 13.5%, from £44,000 to £50,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Firms cautious of upping Asia salaries to new Cravath benchmark Firms cautious of upping Asia salaries to new Cravath benchmark](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.legalweek.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/371/2016/06/Hong-Kong.jpg)
A new $180k high, job cut predictions and more BHS fallout – the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTop 10 UK firms outpace smaller peers with 5.7% revenue growth in 2015-16
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250