MPs demand details of Olswang's fees on BHS sale
Olswang's GC Stephen Hermer has been contacted by chair of the Work and Pensions Select Committee, Frank Field
June 01, 2016 at 07:50 AM
2 minute read
Olswang's general counsel Stephen Hermer has been asked for further details on the firm's involvement in the sale of BHS, including how much the firm's fees for the transaction were.
Chair of the Work and Pensions Select Committee, Labour MP Frank Field, has written to Hermer to request further evidence following the latter's appearance in front of the committee last week (25 May) as part of MPs' investigation into the sale.
Field has asked Hermer how much Olswang charged Retail Acquisitions Limited (RAL) in relation to its purchase of BHS and how much in total it has billed RAL on this and other matters.
Olswang advised RAL on its acquisition of BHS for £1 from UK retail billionaire Sir Philip Green's Arcadia group in March last year.
The high street stalwart went on to enter administration in April this year.
Olswang London corporate partner and head of the firm's leisure and retail practice, David Roberts, led its team and had been expected to appear in front of the committee last week. But Hermer appeared as his replacement.
Field's letter to Hermer, dated 31 May, also asked how much of the fees charged by Olswang were contingent on successful completion of the sale.
He also requested information on the due diligence process undertaken by Olswang into the source of any monies paid to it in fees, specifying: "How many steps back does Olswang look to trace the ultimate source of such monies?"
Field also said that Arcadia's finance director Paul Budge had given evidence to the committee, stating that RAL had put £35m into an escrow account with Olswang. Field asked Hermer what steps Olswang had carried out to find out how this sum had been raised.
Field has given Hermer until 6 June to respond.
Last week, the veteran Labour MP criticised the use of client privilege by partners questioned on the sale and subsequent collapse of BHS.
Prior to the committee meeting that Hermer attended. Field told Legal Week: "I just think it's too easy to claim privilege. It's just laziness and a cover up."
He added: "Fee income seems to muddle people's memories."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPérez-Llorca, Deloitte Legal and White & Case behind €1B Green Deal in Spain
South Africa Regulator’s Staffing Problems Leave High-Stakes M&A Deals in Limbo
4 minute readGoodwin, Conyers, A&O Shearman Act on $800M China Biotech Sale
Trending Stories
- 1New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
- 2Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Office & Dragons
- 3Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 4Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 5Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250