Barclays cuts panel by 60% as DLA Piper loses spot following new review process
Bank slashes legal roster, with DLA Piper missing out as Barclays overhauls panel structure
June 28, 2016 at 12:01 AM
3 minute read
Barclays has slashed its legal line-up by around 60% in a review that has seen DLA Piper among those losing their place on the roster.
The bank has cut the total number of firms it works with from 350-400 to 140, with no new firms joining the list.
Ashurst, Hogan Lovells, Simmons & Simmons, Addleshaw Goddard, Eversheds, Bond Dickinson, DWF and Reed Smith are among those retaining spots on the roster, with the first three previously sitting on a 19-strong list of 'preferred firms' appointed in 2014.
The panel will be in place from 1 July for two years.
The latest panel review, which was led by Stéphanie Hamon, the bank's new head of commercial management who joined in December from King & Wood Mallesons, has seen Barclays overhaul the structure of its external legal advisers.
It has introduced three tiers of adviser – panel firm, core specialist firm and specialist firm. It previously had two tiers – preferred firms and approved firms.
Other changes this year include the introduction of a six month review for advisers. The legal executive committee will take charge of this to ensure that the appointed firms' remain in the right category.
Hamon said that there will be more "fluidity" with the new line-up, with firms more likely to move between the three tiers. Commenting on the review, Hamon said the bank took a different approach this year.
She told Legal Week Barclays' legal team carried out a pre-selection process internally, selecting 30 firms to tender across the panel and core specialist firm rosters.
It previously invited all of its firms to tender.
She added: "This was an internal process; we looked at fee levels and quality. We developed a set of expectations and received nominations from internal lawyers. They could comment on as many firms as they wanted to."
The bank also emphasised innovation in the process, with an overarching goal of reducing costs.
There is a greater focus on relationship management this year, and Barclays will now meet all of its panel and core specialist firms on a quarterly basis, while meeting specialist firms on an ad hoc basis.
In addition, the bank is emphasising legal project management in order to drive efficiency.
As previously reported by Legal Week earlier this month, Barclays has asked its legal advisers to draw up three-tiered rate cards.
The bank is expecting firms to price work according to three different rates: strategic, medium and flow, with each tier corresponding to the level of complexity and importance, according to City banking partners.
At the top end, strategic work refers to top-tier advice for matters such as contract negotiation, while at the bottom, flow work corresponds to more basic legal work such as document review.
The bank has also extended its "relationship account" scheme to all of its panel firms. First launched in 2014, the scheme involves law firms providing a certain amount of free legal services annually, mainly legal advice and secondments, in return for a set volume of work.
Previously, the "relationship accounts" system only applied to "preferred firms", but it has now been extended to cover all firms with whom the bank spends a set amount.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGermany’s Wirecard Case Moves to Airport Hangar to Accommodate 100 Lawyers
5 minute readCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readGreenberg Takes 7-Lawyer Project- and Structured-Finance Team From Dentons in Warsaw
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250