Barclays cuts panel by 60% as DLA Piper loses spot following new review process
Bank slashes legal roster, with DLA Piper missing out as Barclays overhauls panel structure
June 28, 2016 at 12:01 AM
3 minute read
Barclays has slashed its legal line-up by around 60% in a review that has seen DLA Piper among those losing their place on the roster.
The bank has cut the total number of firms it works with from 350-400 to 140, with no new firms joining the list.
Ashurst, Hogan Lovells, Simmons & Simmons, Addleshaw Goddard, Eversheds, Bond Dickinson, DWF and Reed Smith are among those retaining spots on the roster, with the first three previously sitting on a 19-strong list of 'preferred firms' appointed in 2014.
The panel will be in place from 1 July for two years.
The latest panel review, which was led by Stéphanie Hamon, the bank's new head of commercial management who joined in December from King & Wood Mallesons, has seen Barclays overhaul the structure of its external legal advisers.
It has introduced three tiers of adviser – panel firm, core specialist firm and specialist firm. It previously had two tiers – preferred firms and approved firms.
Other changes this year include the introduction of a six month review for advisers. The legal executive committee will take charge of this to ensure that the appointed firms' remain in the right category.
Hamon said that there will be more "fluidity" with the new line-up, with firms more likely to move between the three tiers. Commenting on the review, Hamon said the bank took a different approach this year.
She told Legal Week Barclays' legal team carried out a pre-selection process internally, selecting 30 firms to tender across the panel and core specialist firm rosters.
It previously invited all of its firms to tender.
She added: "This was an internal process; we looked at fee levels and quality. We developed a set of expectations and received nominations from internal lawyers. They could comment on as many firms as they wanted to."
The bank also emphasised innovation in the process, with an overarching goal of reducing costs.
There is a greater focus on relationship management this year, and Barclays will now meet all of its panel and core specialist firms on a quarterly basis, while meeting specialist firms on an ad hoc basis.
In addition, the bank is emphasising legal project management in order to drive efficiency.
As previously reported by Legal Week earlier this month, Barclays has asked its legal advisers to draw up three-tiered rate cards.
The bank is expecting firms to price work according to three different rates: strategic, medium and flow, with each tier corresponding to the level of complexity and importance, according to City banking partners.
At the top end, strategic work refers to top-tier advice for matters such as contract negotiation, while at the bottom, flow work corresponds to more basic legal work such as document review.
The bank has also extended its "relationship account" scheme to all of its panel firms. First launched in 2014, the scheme involves law firms providing a certain amount of free legal services annually, mainly legal advice and secondments, in return for a set volume of work.
Previously, the "relationship accounts" system only applied to "preferred firms", but it has now been extended to cover all firms with whom the bank spends a set amount.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance, Milbank Steer Yondr Group’s $900M Debt Financing in Malaysia
Kirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readKirkland Steers Paris-based Antin in ‘Year’s Biggest’ Infrastructure Fund Closing, at €10.2B
3 minute readVenezuela Faces Creditor Class Action Suit After Missing $1.5B Bond Payments
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 2Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 3African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 4Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 5Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250