Macfarlanes boosts associate pay and overhauls bonus system
Travers Smith also boosts pay for associates throughout its ranks
July 08, 2016 at 08:51 AM
2 minute read
Travers Smith and Macfarlanes have both boosted their associate pay, with newly qualified (NQ) lawyers at both firms now earning £71,000 a year.
Macfarlanes, which does not operate a strict associate lockstep, has boosted pay throughout its associate ranks.
Lawyers with one year of post-qualification experience (1PQE) will receive between £77,000 and £79,000, 2PQE lawyers between £80,000 and £88,000 and 3PQE lawyers between £85,000 and £98,000.
The firm has also overhauled its bonus schemes, with lawyers set to receive more if they perform well and the firm exceeds its annual revenue targets.
Macfarlanes has two bonus schemes, one open to all staff and one a performance-related scheme open to solicitors only.
The solicitors' bonus, which pays out in July, was previously capped at 15% of salary, but has now been increased to a potential maximum 25% of salary.
According to the firm, last year the average solicitor received a 9.3% performance-related bonus.
The all-staff bonus scheme pays out in October, once the firm's limited liability partnership accounts have been signed off.
Staff receive a percentage of their pay as a bonus, depending on if the firm exceeds its revenue targets and by how much.
Previously this bonus was capped, but the firm has now removed this cap, potentially increasing the bonus staff can receive, depending on the performance of the firm.
The firm said the average solicitor received a 14.3% bonus last year, when both bonuses were accounted for.
Travers Smith has also introduced a new pay scale, with NQs set to receive £71,000 a year, a £1,000 increase from £70,000 last year.
Lawyers with 1PQE will be paid £71,500, 2PQE lawyers will receive £91,000 and 3PQE lawyers £100,000.
Other firms to have increased their associate pay this year include Herbert Smith Freehills, which announced its pay increases last week, boosting NQ compensation to a potential £90,000 when bonus is taken into account; and Linklaters, where NQ lawyers receiving basic salary and median bonus will receive £81,000, but high performers can receive up to £91,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJones Day, BCLP & Other Major Firms Boost European Teams with Key Partner Hires
4 minute read$13.8 Billion Magomedov Claim Thrown Out by UK High Court
Ropes & Gray, Mori Hamada, Nishimura & Asahi Act on Bain Capital’s $634M Aircraft Business Acquisition in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250