Women fall by the wayside in 2016 partner promotions round
Top 10 UK firms make up 25% fewer women this year than last in 2016 promotion round that is slightly up on last year
July 26, 2016 at 04:27 AM
5 minute read
The number of women made up to partner at the UK's top 10 law firms fell by more than 25% this year, as law firms continue to struggle with the challenges of nurturing a strong pipeline of female legal talent.
An analysis of partner promotions at the UK's largest law firms reveals that while the overall number of lawyers making the grade across the top 30 has held steady, there has been a significant drop-off in the number of women being made up at the top end of the market.
At the 28 UK top 30 firms to have so far announced their 2016 partner promotions, 458 new partners have been made up. Of those, 147 (32%) are female – well down on 2015, when 173 women were made up in a total group of 454 new partners (38%).
The fall has been driven in large part by the UK top 10 firms, where 77 female lawyers were made up in 2016, down 26% from 104 last year. Eight of the top 10 firms made up fewer women this year than last, including Norton Rose Fulbright, which made up 12 female lawyers after promoting 19 last year, and Allen & Overy, which promoted six women after making up nine last year.
The picture is more positive outside of the top 10, with firms in the 11-30 bracket managing to hold female promotions broadly in line with 2015 levels.
DAC Beachcroft, Eversheds and Pinsent Masons were among a group of eight firms at which women comprised more than 40% of this year's new partners, while those to have significantly increased female promotions this year include Clyde & Co, which made up eight women compared with five last year, and BLP, where five of its new partners this year were female. The firm made up just one woman in 2015.
Managing partner Lisa Mayhew commented: "This really was an exceptional year but there wasn't a change in approach compared to previous years. We have stuck to what we always have done; promoting based on merit. We do have an ambitious gender target to reach 30% of women in our partnership by the end of 2018, but this year's cohort each provided a robust and ambitious business case."
The drop-off in female promotions comes despite the efforts of many top law firms to support the development of women on the partnership track. Bird & Bird, which has made up just two female lawyers in the past two years, recently announced plans for a new training programme aimed at boosting the number of women in its partnership.
Bird & Bird HR director Jonathan Nichols acknowledges the need to do more: "It's very much about promoting the individuals that are ready, but you can never guarantee it. We are hoping this year will be an anomaly."
According to many partners, the fluctuations in female promotions year-on-year lies in the lack of a sustainable pipeline at present, meaning efforts to increase the number of women one year can make it harder the next.
As Linklaters' managing partner Gideon Moore said in an interview earlier this year: "You need to look right at the beginning of the pipeline to see when the flow of women starts moving in the wrong direction…you need to work out and act where the problem starts."
Proportional representation
Looking beyond women to the promotion round more broadly, the firm in the number one spot in the revenue rankings, DLA Piper, made the greatest number of promotions in absolute terms this year, with 48. However, when expressed as a proportion of overall partnership size, a group of five firms emerge as the most generous promoters – Slaughter and May, Addleshaw Goddard, Eversheds, Macfarlanes and Berwin Leighton Paisner
Addleshaws' 15-strong promotions round this year equates to 9% of its total partner count as of May 2015, while Slaughters also boosted its partnership by 9%, with 11 promotions this year. Eversheds, Macfarlanes and Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) all added 8% to their partner count with their latest promotion rounds of 26, six and 17 respectively.
Capital gains
As has been the trend for several years now, international promotions outnumbered UK promotions by some margin. However, London this year gained a little ground with 32% of all of this year's new partners based in the City, up from 29% last year.
More than half of the 28 firms (15) made up more partners in London this year, with notable increases at firms including DLA Piper, which doubled City promotions from four last year to eight this year, and BLP, which made up 14 City partners after promoting just three in the capital last year.
Conversely, firms turning their focus away from London include Norton Rose Fulbright, where just two of 2016's intake of 39 new partners are based in the City; and CMS, which also made up just two in London this year and has now promoted just eight London lawyers in the past three years, from a total of 101 made up around the world.
The question now for many firms will be the extent to which Brexit affects future partner promotion rounds. While the UK's exit from the European Union is not expected to take effect until 2019 at the earliest, Brexit's immediate impact on the London market could well have a knock-on effect on career prospects far sooner. And for City lawyers on the partnership track, that business case could well become a lot harder to put together.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250