Lawyers in Pakistan stage nationwide strike following bomb attack
Strikes called in response to bombings targeting lawyers earlier this week
August 10, 2016 at 07:24 AM
3 minute read
Lawyers across Pakistan are staging nationwide strikes following a bomb attack at a hospital that killed and injured lawyers who were mourning the death of another colleague.
Following calls for a strike by the Pakistan Bar Council and the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan, legal professionals from all over the country are boycotting court proceedings in response to the bombing in the city of Quetta on Monday (8 August), which killed more than 70 people.
According to the Karachi-based English language daily newspaper The Express Tribune, lawyers and judges in the capital Islamabad, and in provinces Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab, adjourned court proceedings and demanded justice for the victims and arrests for perpetrators.
All legal proceedings were suspended at the Sindh High Court, which is seated in the provincial capital of Karachi, at the request of the Sindh High Court Bar Association, the newspaper reported. Proceedings were also halted at the Karachi City courts.
The Islamabad High Court Bar Association and the Islamabad District Bar Association also announced a boycott of all court proceedings, The Express Tribune reported .
In Lahore, the capital of the eastern Pakistani province Punjab, and Peshawar, the capital of the northern province Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, local bar associations also condemned the attacks and announced strikes.
The bombing happened on Monday morning at the Civil Hospital in Quetta, capital city of the southwestern province of Balochistan. A suicide bomb went off as dozens of lawyers gathered in the hospital, mourning the death of Bilal Anwar Kasi, a lawyer who served as the president of the Balochistan Bar Association before being killed in a drive-by shooting earlier yesterday. The lawyers killed by the blast also include Baz Muhammad Kakar, a predecessor of Kasi as president of the provincial bar association.
The Pakistan Bar Association is proposing a two-stage victim compensation scheme to the government, The Express Tribune reported. In the first stage, the payment proposed is about $19,130 (2 million Pakistani rupees) for the families of each lawyer killed, and $9,566 to each lawyer injured in the attack. The proposal also recommends a second stage in which an additional $47,830 would be paid to the families of each lawyer killed, and $23,900 to each lawyer injured in the attack.
Following the attack, both the Islamic State and a faction of the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for the bombing, according to Al-Jazeera.
Pakistani army chief Raheel Sharif, who had visited the victims at the hospital yesterday, said the attack in Quetta was an attempt to undermine security in the province, especially targeting the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.
Balochistan is the largest province by area in Pakistan. While Quetta is located in the northern part of the province near Afghanistan, Balochistan also borders the Arabian Sea to the south and is envisioned as a key intersection of China's ambitious One Belt, One Road initiatives – namely, the inland-based Silk Road Economic Belt and the ocean-facing Maritime Silk Road. Chinese companies are planning multibillion-dollar projects in the seaport city of Gwadar.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 2Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 3Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 4Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 5Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250