Addleshaws-Hunton merger talks stall amid UK and US political uncertainty
Transatlantic merger talks held up by fallout from Brexit vote
August 24, 2016 at 06:07 AM
3 minute read
Merger talks between UK firm Addleshaw Goddard and US firm Hunton & Williams have stalled following the UK's June vote to leave the European Union (EU).
Partners at the firms told Legal Week that the discussions, which were first reported in May this year but are understood to have begun at the tail end of 2015, have slowed down in the wake of the EU referendum, in order to assess the impact of Brexit on the UK.
An Addleshaws partner said: "The US deal is still ongoing but it has slowed because the dust hasn't settled on Brexit yet."
The forthcoming US presidential election is also understood to have played a part in the delays.
Nothing has yet been formally put to the partnership at Addleshaws but prior to the Brexit vote, talks between the pair had progressed to a stage where there was a "sufficient degree of conformity that everyone was comfortable with the basics and the feel culturally", according to one Addleshaws partner.
A deal between the pair would create a firm with combined revenue of around £554m and more than 1,300 lawyers.
Hunton has 13 offices across the US, alongside small international outposts in Brussels, Beijing, Tokyo, London and Bangkok, while Addleshaws has three UK offices and international offices in Dubai, Hong Kong, Oman, Qatar and Singapore.
A merger would increase both firms' coverage with relatively little overlap, as the only duplicate office is in London, where Hunton has a six-partner base.
Addleshaws posted revenue of £201.8m for the 2015-16 financial year, up from £192.4m the previous year, while profit per equity partner (PEP) soared by 39% to £682,000, from £491,000.
The firm's results were boosted by fees paid for mandates from previous years, partly connected to the long-running Berezovsky litigation.
In contrast, Hunton's turnover dropped 7% to $528m (£361.6m) in 2015, making it the 62nd largest firm by revenue in the US. Its PEP stood at $950,000 (£650,039), down 5%.
In the past 12 months, Addleshaws has also held merger talks with Scottish firm Maclay Murray & Spens, which were called off earlier this year after the two sides failed to come to an agreement.
Addleshaws declined to comment and Hunton did not respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMinterEllison, Latham Advise Anglo American on $3.8B Australian Divestments
2 minute readLatham, Skadden Among Firms Acting on Mubadala's $3.4 B Acquisition of CI Financial
3 minute readMcCarthy Tétrault Welcomes Former CPP Investments Leader to Its Business Law Group
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250