McDermott votes in new leadership after contested election
Corporate head chosen to lead US firm
September 16, 2016 at 06:05 AM
2 minute read
McDermott Will & Emery has chosen global corporate head Ira Coleman as its next chairman after a contested election featuring four other contenders.
The vote was cast by the 21 partners who sit on McDermott's management committee, with a majority required to win. The voting was anonymous and committee members were not told the tallies of each vote, only whether a majority has been reached.
Four other US-based partners had campaigned for the top spot: intellectual property head Sarah Chapin Columbia; litigation head Lazar Raynal; employee benefits, compensation, labour and employment head David Rogers; and financial institutions head David Taub.
Coleman (pictured above), who also runs the firm's Miami office, said the other candidates have all pledged their support. "Each one of them said, 'I'm here for you,'" he said.
He has a practice focusing on healthcare and private equity, with a client base that includes Goldman Sachs, Altaris Capital Partners, the Blackstone Group and the Carlyle Group, according to the firm's website.
Coleman said he will give up his full-time practice, while continuing his client relationships. He will take charge of the sprawling Chicago-based firm – which has more than 1,000 lawyers in 20 offices – at the start of next year, succeeding Jeffrey Stone and Peter Sacripanti, who have led McDermott for eight years as co-chairmen. The chairman's term is for one year but leaders have typically served for seven or eight years.
"Ira is an exceptional leader, and I am fully confident in his ability to take the reins and lead our firm into the future," Sacripanti said in a statement. Stone added: "I've had the privilege of working closely with Ira over many years, and have seen first-hand the commitment and passion he brings every day to our clients and our people."
Sacripanti and Stone will remain on the firm's management committee and will practice law full time.
Last year, McDermott's revenue declined 1% to $891.5m, while its revenue still sits significantly below pre-recession levels, when it peaked at $978m in 2007. Revenue per lawyer at the Chicago-based firm inched up 1.1% last year, to $910,000, and profits per equity partner rose 3.3%, to $1.58m.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250