The pay gap – which firms have the biggest disparity between top and bottom of the equity?
Partner pay figures highlight stark differences between those at top and bottom of lockstep
September 16, 2016 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
The lowest paid equity partners at at least five UK top 50 firms take home less than 20% of what the top equity partners receive, Legal Week research has revealed.
Figures provided for Legal Week's annual UK top 50 rankings show CMS, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Gowling WLG, Watson Farley & Williams and RPC all paid the partners at the bottom of their equity less than a fifth of what their top earners received for 2015-16.
Thirty UK top 50 firms disclosed top and bottom of equity figures for the research and, of those, CMS has the biggest pay gap in percentage terms, with the firm's top earner receiving 10 times the pay of the lowest earner. Figures provided by the firm showed that the highest paid member took home £1.126m last year, compared to just £115,000 at the bottom of the equity.
In a statement, CMS – which has 61 offices in 36 countries – says: "The gap is a reflection of our global reach and large geographical spread, and the economics of each individual marketplace in which we operate."
Average profit per equity partner (PEP) at the firm was £443,000, meaning the highest paid member received more than two and a half times that amount.
Freshfields has the next biggest discrepancy between highest and lowest earner, with the firm's top earner receiving more then £2m while the lowest paid partner took home just 16% of that – £335,000.
The £335,000 bottom of the equity figure represents just 22% of the firm's 2015-16 PEP, which at £1.47m was the second highest in this year's UK top 50 rankings.
At the start of this year, Freshfields moved some partners to a lower lockstep ladder as part of a push to ramp up profitability. The firm first introduced a second-tier lockstep ladder running from 10-30 points – compared with the standard 17.5-50 points – in late 2013, but it is understood that its use has increased significantly this year.
Former Clifford Chance managing partner and Jomati Consultants principal Tony Williams says these kind of discrepancies in pay are simply part of the environment partners must accept.
"This is a reflection of the reality of working in a very competitive market, particularly with the influence of US firms. Firms just recognise they have a limited profit pot – if they are overpaying someone they are underpaying someone else," he explains.
Is it better to reward good people who feel under-rewarded, or others who are complaining life is hard?
Williams adds: "It is a challenge – you can use different metrics, make sure you are encouraging and keeping to key principles, but let's get real – if you want to be at the top of the equity at a major magic circle firm you have got to have a £4m-£5m practice. If you cannot deliver that you either have to move down or move out – that's business in a high performance culture. You have to pick the lesser of two evils – is it better to reward good people who feel under-rewarded, or others who are complaining life is hard?"
Elsewhere, Gowling WLG's bottom earner took home £148,000, just over 18% of what its top earner received. The top of the equity figure of £815,000 is more than twice the firm's PEP of £379,000.
At Watson Farley & Williams, its lowest earner took home 17.5% of what its highest paid partner received, with the firm's top earner taking home £1.2m, compared to £210,000 at the bottom of the equity.
Watson Farley co-managing partner Chris Lowe says: "We widened our equity this year and the figures reflect this. We believe a wider range is important, especially for an international firm with equity partners spread across multiple jurisdictions, as it prevents exchange rates being a barrier for talented young partners to join our equity and accommodates high performing partners in our lockstep."
Completing the five firms that paid their lowest earner less than a fifth of what their top earners took home was RPC. The firm's best paid partner netted just over £1m, while its lowest earner took home £200,000 – 55% of the firm's £362,000 PEP figure.
In contrast, a handful of UK top 50 firms have a much narrower equity spread, including three that pay their lowest earning equity partner at least 50% of the firm's top of the equity figure – Mills & Reeve, Blake Morgan and Holman Fenwick Willan.
Mills & Reeve, which this year placed 45th in the UK top 50, paid its highest earner £431,000 in 2015-16, while its lowest earner received 68% of that amount – £294,000.
Blake Morgan and Holman Fenwick Williams both have bottom of the equity figures standing at 50% of their top of equity figure, while a further eight firms – including magic circle players Allen & Overy and Linklaters – paid their bottom of the equity partners at least 40% of their top of the equity figures.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGerman Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
Hengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250