Dentons to launch new 250-firm legal referral network
Legal networks hit back at Dentons' Nextlaw claims
September 23, 2016 at 05:53 AM
4 minute read
Dentons is set to roll out a giant new legal referral network within days, the head of the initiative revealed this week.
During a seminar on law firm networks at the International Bar Association's annual meeting in Washington DC, Jeff Modisett, a senior counsel at Dentons who serves as CEO of the Dentons-branded Nextlaw Global Referral Network, told those in attendance that the network will go live next week with roughly 250 firms and 18,000 lawyers.
Modisett did not return a request for more details by the time of this story, but the numbers he unveiled would immediately propel Nextlaw to the top of the network ranks by size. Among the elite traditional networks, Lex Mundi has 160 firm members and 21,000 lawyers; TerraLex has 162 firms and 17,000 lawyers; and the World Services Group has 150 members and 19,000 lawyers, according to a 2016 network directory.
Dentons is the first global firm to recognise the potential benefits of underwriting and running its own referral network. Though firms participating in Nextlaw are not required to have an exclusive arrangement with the global Swiss verein or others in the network, they will utilise a common online platform that promotes reciprocal referrals, Dentons said in May.
In the same announcement, Dentons global chair Joe Andrew (pictured) made waves when he said that the firm-vetted network, offered free to joining firms, was intended to disrupt the traditional networks' 'pay-to-play' referral system.
Since May, Andrew has written several columns taking the networks to task as part of a campaign to tout Nextlaw, which earlier this week took part in a $2.25m funding round for legal software company Doxly.
However, a trade association representing the most established networks is not taking the challenge from Andrew and Dentons lying down. On Wednesday, the Association of International Law Firm Networks (AILFN) unveiled a free online database, Locate Law Networks, allowing anyone to search 45 networks' combined 3,500 firms, which altogether employ some 300,000 lawyers.
"There are a lot of good networks out there," said Stephen McGarry, a president of AILFN and founder of Lex Mundi and World Services Group. "The issue is they are not well known."
Using the search fields, a potential firm can now easily locate vetted firms in jurisdictions where it has no office. Firms in a specific jurisdiction that have not yet joined a network can use the same search fields to determine which do not yet have members in their jurisdiction. Each network's contact information and website is listed. Until the database was unveiled, "you would have to click on each network individually and see if they had someone in your location, and you might not even know which websites to go to", McGarry said.
A map of the 45 largest networks' AILFN member networks shows that only a few countries remain outside of any networks, mostly war-torn nations such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Sudan. McGarry hopes the new tool will "help fill up the map".
McGarry, who in June had strong words for Dentons, takes issue with the firm's characterisation of global referral networks as 'pay-to-play', noting that network members are not prohibited from referring matters outside their network. Many firms, in fact, have joined several networks. He said the fees to join a traditional network are immaterial and added that they offer something that Dentons' Nextlaw cannot: a track record.
Traditional network firms "have all been vetted, on average for more than 20 years", McGarry said, adding: "They are regularly visited by a network representative, they're on committees with each other and their relationships are very strong. That's a completely different from Dentons' network, where they're putting together 250 strangers in a room."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250