Does the US need a dedicated court for complex financial disputes?
Justice William Blair, judge in charge of the Commercial Court, discusses the introduction of the new Financial List
September 28, 2016 at 05:17 PM
4 minute read
As business disputes grow in size and complexity, would a specialised court with expert judges that is designed to speed up rulings and the appeals process be a good idea in the US? This was one of the topics at a recent discussion given by Sir William Blair, known in the courts as Justice Blair, at the New York offices of Brown Rudnick last week (22 September).
Blair – the older brother of former Prime Minister Tony Blair – explained the origin of the UK's Financial List, a specialist cross-jurisdictional list set up last year to address the particular business needs of parties litigating on financial matters.
It draws on the expertise of judges from both the Chancery and the Queen's Bench Divisions, with the objective of ensuring that cases that would benefit from being heard by judges with a specialism in financial markets work will be streamlined and managed by a single specialist judge.
The Financial List was created in October 2015 to hear and rule on complex business cases worth more than £50m, hearing disputes in areas such as equities, fixed income, foreign exchange, derivatives and the commodities markets, as well as complex banking transactions and sovereign debt.
"We thought it was right for us because we get a disproportionate number of financial disparities because we [London] are a financial centre," said Blair. "It's natural for us to think particularly of financial disputes because whereas here you have a vast economy that is generating commercial disputes right across the board, ours tend to be more specialised," he added.
The aim of the list is to resolve disputes quickly and definitely according to Blair, and an appeal can often be heard within days of the case's first ruling.
With cases heard at the Rolls Building in London, 12 judges sit on the bench, including five from the commercial courts, led by Justice Blair, and five from the Chancery Division.
"So far, the cases range from derivatives to sovereign debt to the rights of trustees in financial transactions. I wouldn't say there is a theme [to the Financial List cases] but there are quite a number of derivatives cases in our courts and in yours," added Blair.
Since its creation in 2015, the Financial List heard eight cases in its first year and has ruled on 13 cases so far this year.
"These are cases that demand a high degree of specialisation to decide," said Justice Blair.
Would a Financial List work in New York in the same way that it works in London? David Molton, a litigation and arbitration partner at Brown Rudnick, is doubtful.
"Here in the US I think often we learn from what happens in London and sometimes they learn from us as well. In terms of what Justice Blair said about the fact that London has a more particular need for a sophisticated specialised financial court, I think is probably true and less apparent here and less needful here," Molton said.
He added: "Our federal judges who get these cases all the time handle them quite competently and expertly. Also the commercial bench of the New York State Supreme Court does a terrific job dealing with these sort of cases. I think that likely the need for a specialised financial bench is less apparent here than it would be in England."
Neil Micklethwaite, a litigation and arbitration partner in Brown Rudnick's London and Paris offices, said the discussion was never meant to promote the idea of a Financial List in New York.
"I think [the meeting was inspired by] the connection between New York and London. Cooperation and exchange of knowledge is a very important part of that," said Micklethwaite. "It's for New York to decide whether it wants to say that this would work for them."
The Honourable Mr Justice Blair is the keynote speaker at the Legal Week Commercial Litigation & Arbitration Forum, which will take place in London on 3 November. Click here for full details.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHogan Lovells Hires Team of Top White & Case Corporate and Finance Partners in Italy
2 minute readClifford Chance, Milbank Steer Yondr Group’s $900M Debt Financing in Malaysia
Kirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
- 2‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
- 3LinkedIn Accused of Sharing LinkedIn Learning Video Data With Meta
- 4Delaware Supreme Court Agrees Insurance Dispute Can Be Retried
- 5New Strategies For Estate, Legacy Planning
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250