Law firm cyber attacks on the rise with 73 of UK top 100 targeted
73% of the top 100 UK law firms were hit by cyber attacks last year, research by PwC shows
October 25, 2016 at 06:23 AM
4 minute read
Cyber attacks on UK law firms climbed by nearly 20% between 2014-15 and 2015-16, according to new research that found that 73% of the UK top 100 were the target of attacks last year.
The prevalance of cyber attacks has now grown by more than 60% in two years, according to PwC's 25th annual Law Firms Survey, with the number of top 100 firms experiencing an attack rising from 45 in 2013-14 to 62 in 2014-15, and 73 during the most recent financial year.
The numbers were highest among larger firms, with almost 90% of firms in the top 25 facing attacks last year.
The most common security incidents faced by firms were email phishing attacks to try to gain access to client money, which 84% of firms that had been victims of attacks had suffered.
Patrick Hill, a partner at DAC Beachcroft and head of the firm's professional risk team, said: "There has been a huge rise in these types of attacks over the last couple of years."
He explained that in these attacks, "the hacker poses as a third party when emailing or getting in contact with a firm and specifies that purchase money should be sent to a different account".
Fifty-five percent of firms targeted by cyber attacks had been victims of attacks with viruses or other malware, while 16% of those targeted had faced significant attempts to break into their firm's network.
Hill said: "You can see a big reputational threat to law firms on the wrong end of these data breach incidents. If you are a major law firm, the ability to ensure your clients' data is kept confidential is absolutely key to your standing."
Firms also face an internal threat, with 41% of those that suffered security incidents victim to incidents caused by staff.
In March, security company Flashpoint released a report naming 48 leading law firms that had been targeted by cyber criminals looking to steal M&A information. The report named firms such as Allen & Overy, Hogan Lovells, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Kirkland & Ellis and Sullivan & Cromwell as potential targets. However, there was no evidence that any of the law firms targeted by the attacks had any information stolen.
The security information was contained within a wider report into the financial performance of the UK's largest law firms by PwC.
The report found that a combination of growing pressure from clients on fees, increasing associate salary costs and declining productivity is causing profit margins to fall at the UK's largest law firms.
The challenging market conditions are also resulting in decreasing revenues at a quarter of the UK top 100, the study found – up from around 18% last year. Firms are largely maintaining average equity partner profits through "tight control" of their equity, however.
David Snell, the head of PwC's law firms advisory group, said that while the sector was in "good shape" overall, many firms have been left with too many lawyers (the total number of lawyers at the UK top 50 increased 7.6% during the past 12 months) after overestimating client demand.
"As confidence returned to the sector last year, firms increased headcount in anticipation of continued improving market conditions," he said. "However, with the market turning out to be more challenging than expected and with increased competition from US firms and new entrants, spare capacity is now an issue for firms. "
This situation is likely to be "exacerbated" by market uncertainty following the Brexit vote, he added.
Snell said firms are now facing a period of "significant financial investment" in order to keep up with technological advancements, and predicts that the use of artificial intelligence will become "widespread" across the industry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinklaters Sees Latest Partner Exit as UK Leveraged Finance Partner Walks To Simpson Thacher
2 minute readEx-Dewey & LeBoeuf Banking Lawyer on Trial in Germany’s Cum-Ex Tax Scandal
DLA Piper & Hogan Lovells Expand German Construction and Property Practices
2 minute readWhite & Case, Cleary Among Firms Gearing Up for Biggest London IPO Since 2022
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 2Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 3Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 4Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 5SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250