'A powerful reputation in tech' – Top 20 Legal IT Innovators 2016: Cooley London managing partner Justin Stock
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles the law firm leaders, in-house lawyers and tech pioneers driving change in the legal profession.
November 04, 2016 at 08:10 AM
4 minute read
Click here to download the report from Legal Week Law (free registration required).
Justin Stock is the managing partner of Cooley's London office, which opened in January 2015 with 55 lawyers – the largest ever launch by a US firm not arising from a merger.
Stock started out at Werksmans in Johannesburg before moving to Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in London. After an eight-year spell with two US firms, he joined Cooley at the London launch and has since grown the office to 80 lawyers. At the British Legal Awards in 2015, Cooley won the London Office of the Year award, with the judges describing the US firm as the "winner by a mile".
Cooley also fares well in several league tables. At 28th position in Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work For, it has been ranked for three years in a row and is now the number one law firm. Its attraction for young lawyers is reflected partly in the name: the firm has a very cool client base – Google, Facebook, SpaceX and Uber, by way of example. This is underpinned by a strong financial performance. Cooley recorded a 19% increase in revenues for 2014, and 14% in 2015, making it one of the fastest growing firms on the Am Law 100.
Stock remembered this when getting the call from Cooley: "I thought: that's interesting. One of the last big US firms to enter the market; very much in the tech and life sciences space. I went along almost on a reconnaissance mission and met Joe Conroy, our CEO. It was a very good meeting. I quickly saw his vision of what he wanted to build in London and as a European presence, and it very much aligned with mine."
Because a large number of Cooley clients are in Europe, the need to be in London was self-evident: they were sending too much work to other law firms and the tech sector, a core focus for Cooley, was booming in London. But Stock told Conroy: "Please realise it's not like opening in another big US city, where most of the companies would have heard of us – no one in London is going to know who on earth Cooley is." Stock now concedes that he was mistaken: in the UK life sciences space, among others, the Cooley name has significant brand recognition.
Following the meeting, Stock presented Conroy with a business plan for the office, outlining a course for the next five years. "I said it would be great if we could end up having around 35% of the revenue generated by existing firm clients, essentially US office clients, because there's no point just being a silo. But at the same time you don't want to be a service office." Stock got the job – and soon began building the team and the brand in London.
To be able to really understand these fast-moving industries, you have to own those spaces, to truly understand them
Significantly, the office has already reached a figure of roughly 25% of work being generated from US clients. "From my point of view, 25% is a great start; a lot higher than I expected for the first 18 months," says Stock.
Cooley has also added more than 25 lawyers to the office since launch: "We've made great strides and we're not stopping here," he adds. "It is a great challenge making significant numbers of lateral hires, both at the associate and partner level, from different firms with different cultures. Cooley has a special culture of collaboration and support that sets it apart from other firms. We are all focused on maintaining and strengthening it, despite our rapid growth."
In a crowded field of US law firms in London – more than 100 – Cooley has a clear USP. "Something which differentiates us from the many others," explains Stock. It is based on "a really powerful reputation in tech and life sciences for commercial, business-savvy advice".
"To be able to really understand these fast-moving industries, you have to own those spaces, to truly understand them." Stock says that Cooley has a genuine commitment to looking after "not just the companies, but the whole innovation ecosystem". As a USP, he finds that "very exciting". So, it would appear, do the firm's clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 2In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 3A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 4Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 5Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250