'A powerful reputation in tech' – Top 20 Legal IT Innovators 2016: Cooley London managing partner Justin Stock
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles the law firm leaders, in-house lawyers and tech pioneers driving change in the legal profession.
November 04, 2016 at 08:10 AM
4 minute read
Click here to download the report from Legal Week Law (free registration required).
Justin Stock is the managing partner of Cooley's London office, which opened in January 2015 with 55 lawyers – the largest ever launch by a US firm not arising from a merger.
Stock started out at Werksmans in Johannesburg before moving to Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in London. After an eight-year spell with two US firms, he joined Cooley at the London launch and has since grown the office to 80 lawyers. At the British Legal Awards in 2015, Cooley won the London Office of the Year award, with the judges describing the US firm as the "winner by a mile".
Cooley also fares well in several league tables. At 28th position in Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work For, it has been ranked for three years in a row and is now the number one law firm. Its attraction for young lawyers is reflected partly in the name: the firm has a very cool client base – Google, Facebook, SpaceX and Uber, by way of example. This is underpinned by a strong financial performance. Cooley recorded a 19% increase in revenues for 2014, and 14% in 2015, making it one of the fastest growing firms on the Am Law 100.
Stock remembered this when getting the call from Cooley: "I thought: that's interesting. One of the last big US firms to enter the market; very much in the tech and life sciences space. I went along almost on a reconnaissance mission and met Joe Conroy, our CEO. It was a very good meeting. I quickly saw his vision of what he wanted to build in London and as a European presence, and it very much aligned with mine."
Because a large number of Cooley clients are in Europe, the need to be in London was self-evident: they were sending too much work to other law firms and the tech sector, a core focus for Cooley, was booming in London. But Stock told Conroy: "Please realise it's not like opening in another big US city, where most of the companies would have heard of us – no one in London is going to know who on earth Cooley is." Stock now concedes that he was mistaken: in the UK life sciences space, among others, the Cooley name has significant brand recognition.
Following the meeting, Stock presented Conroy with a business plan for the office, outlining a course for the next five years. "I said it would be great if we could end up having around 35% of the revenue generated by existing firm clients, essentially US office clients, because there's no point just being a silo. But at the same time you don't want to be a service office." Stock got the job – and soon began building the team and the brand in London.
To be able to really understand these fast-moving industries, you have to own those spaces, to truly understand them
Significantly, the office has already reached a figure of roughly 25% of work being generated from US clients. "From my point of view, 25% is a great start; a lot higher than I expected for the first 18 months," says Stock.
Cooley has also added more than 25 lawyers to the office since launch: "We've made great strides and we're not stopping here," he adds. "It is a great challenge making significant numbers of lateral hires, both at the associate and partner level, from different firms with different cultures. Cooley has a special culture of collaboration and support that sets it apart from other firms. We are all focused on maintaining and strengthening it, despite our rapid growth."
In a crowded field of US law firms in London – more than 100 – Cooley has a clear USP. "Something which differentiates us from the many others," explains Stock. It is based on "a really powerful reputation in tech and life sciences for commercial, business-savvy advice".
"To be able to really understand these fast-moving industries, you have to own those spaces, to truly understand them." Stock says that Cooley has a genuine commitment to looking after "not just the companies, but the whole innovation ecosystem". As a USP, he finds that "very exciting". So, it would appear, do the firm's clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250