Host of UK firms set to oppose Hong Kong Stock Exchange reform proposals
Linklaters and Freshfields among firms likely to raise concerns over proposed regulatory overhaul
November 08, 2016 at 08:05 PM
3 minute read
Linklaters and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer are among a raft of major law firms set to raise concerns over proposed changes to Hong Kong Stock Exchange regulations, amid fears the proposals will lead to a reduction in the number of listings taking place.
The changes, which are detailed in a joint consultation issued this June by Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, include a proposal for the establishment of two new exchange committees, one of which will set listing policy and another that will decide on IPO and post-IPO matters that have "suitability concerns".
Linklaters Asia corporate head Robert Cleaver told Legal Week that the firm is submitting a response opposing the suggestions, alongside feedback from banking clients.
Cleaver said: "Broadly speaking, what we are saying is that we think the proposals, while well intentioned, are supposed to be simplifying the whole thing. But it seems to us to be complicating the thing, because they are creating two extra committees."
Cleaver also cited concerns about the impact two new committees would have on the role of the current listing committee, making it less attractive to potential members.
Ashurst capital markets partner Stuart Rubin said of the proposals: "There is some concern that the SFC as a regulator may adopt an even higher level of conservatism than currently accompanies Hong Kong listings."
Rubin also referred to concerns in the market that such a move may lead to Hong Kong becoming a "less attractive listing destination, particularly if the proposed listing process is as not as efficient as anticipated".
Others, however, have taken a more positive view of the proposals. One Hong Kong capital markets partner said: "Personally, I am in favour of it. You can't have the exchange vetting applicants when they need to encourage more companies to list."
Davis Polk & Wardwell and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer are both submitting responses on behalf of international investment banks.
Freshfields' submission says the proposals give rise to concerns about the impact on the timetabling of listings and listing applicants, saying: "These concerns serve to potentially further negatively impact the view of potential listing applicants and the appeal of the Hong Kong market as a whole."
Slaughter and May has submitted a response to the proposed changes on behalf of the Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (ASIFMA) – an independent trade association for financial institutions. Hong Kong partners John Moore and Roger Cheng are advising ASIFMA.
The deadline for submissions for the consultation is 18 November.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Cleary, Clifford Chance Help Middle East Sovereign Wealth Funds Monetise Assets
3 minute readWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Trending Stories
- 1Legaltech Rundown: McDermott Will & Emery Invests $10 million in The LegalTech Fund, LexisNexis Releases Conversational Search for Nexis+ AI, and More
- 2The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 3New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 4Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
- 55th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250