'The shocks will come' – law firms urged to adjust ahead of Brexit profit squeeze
NatWest legal sector report predicts tough times ahead for UK law firms
November 08, 2016 at 08:44 AM
3 minute read
UK law firms must adjust their business as factors such as Brexit and the rise of the accountants squeeze a market that is already under huge pressure, according to the latest NatWest legal sector report.
The report, previously issued under the Royal Bank of Scotland's banner, looks at what lies ahead for UK law firms and suggests that activity levels are likely to suffer, particularly in areas such as real estate.
James Tsolakis, head of the legal sector within UK corporate and institutional banking at NatWest, says: "We haven't had any material shocks yet as a result of Brexit but they will come – let's not be complacent. It's a doubled-edged sword. It's very threatening in terms of volume and value of transactions, and the forward-thinking firms are already planning for the adverse consequences by looking at right-sizing and jobs coming out of the sector.
"The other side of that is more advisory work for the duration of the process – but not everyone will be the beneficiary of that."
According to Tsolakis (pictured), combined with structural changes taking place in the legal sector, the profession could comfortably see a reduction of 5% in lawyer numbers in London.
The more challenging market conditions combined with the continued movement towards bigger firms will make organic growth more difficult to achieve, according to the report, driving further consolidation.
"The accountants and US firms are also a threat, and all of this will squeeze the mid-tier more," says Tsolakis. "It will cause a profitability challenge, particularly as the increases in associate salaries inflate the cost structure of law firms, leading to greater pressure on margins."
A particular post-Brexit threat for UK firms is the advantage that the weaker pound gives US firms when it comes to recruitment. This, when combined with the longstanding higher profitability of US firms, will pile additional pressure on both lockstep and law firm cost structures.
"The fall in sterling means it is now 20% cheaper for US firms to buy in talent than it was a few months ago, which is a threat to the magic circle and mid-tier," says Tsolakis. "Top-end talent is being squeezed out, which is challenging lockstep and putting the whole law firm compensation model in question, as sterling has weakened.
"When you overlay the fall in sterling with the profitability challenge and the squeeze from Brexit, the law firm model is changing. Law firms need to move from a fixed cost structure to a variable one so that they can adjust in line with activity levels."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeaders at Top French Firms Anticipate Strong M&A Market in 2025 Despite Uncertainty
6 minute readEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readSimpson Thacher Becomes Second Firm to Launch in Luxembourg in 2 Days With A&O Shearman Hires
3 minute readHSF Hires Trio for Luxembourg Launch, Builds Private Capital Practice
Trending Stories
- 1Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 2Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 33rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 4Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
- 5Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250