'The shocks will come' – law firms urged to adjust ahead of Brexit profit squeeze
NatWest legal sector report predicts tough times ahead for UK law firms
November 08, 2016 at 08:44 AM
3 minute read
UK law firms must adjust their business as factors such as Brexit and the rise of the accountants squeeze a market that is already under huge pressure, according to the latest NatWest legal sector report.
The report, previously issued under the Royal Bank of Scotland's banner, looks at what lies ahead for UK law firms and suggests that activity levels are likely to suffer, particularly in areas such as real estate.
James Tsolakis, head of the legal sector within UK corporate and institutional banking at NatWest, says: "We haven't had any material shocks yet as a result of Brexit but they will come – let's not be complacent. It's a doubled-edged sword. It's very threatening in terms of volume and value of transactions, and the forward-thinking firms are already planning for the adverse consequences by looking at right-sizing and jobs coming out of the sector.
"The other side of that is more advisory work for the duration of the process – but not everyone will be the beneficiary of that."
According to Tsolakis (pictured), combined with structural changes taking place in the legal sector, the profession could comfortably see a reduction of 5% in lawyer numbers in London.
The more challenging market conditions combined with the continued movement towards bigger firms will make organic growth more difficult to achieve, according to the report, driving further consolidation.
"The accountants and US firms are also a threat, and all of this will squeeze the mid-tier more," says Tsolakis. "It will cause a profitability challenge, particularly as the increases in associate salaries inflate the cost structure of law firms, leading to greater pressure on margins."
A particular post-Brexit threat for UK firms is the advantage that the weaker pound gives US firms when it comes to recruitment. This, when combined with the longstanding higher profitability of US firms, will pile additional pressure on both lockstep and law firm cost structures.
"The fall in sterling means it is now 20% cheaper for US firms to buy in talent than it was a few months ago, which is a threat to the magic circle and mid-tier," says Tsolakis. "Top-end talent is being squeezed out, which is challenging lockstep and putting the whole law firm compensation model in question, as sterling has weakened.
"When you overlay the fall in sterling with the profitability challenge and the squeeze from Brexit, the law firm model is changing. Law firms need to move from a fixed cost structure to a variable one so that they can adjust in line with activity levels."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLosing its 'Sparkle'? Why Latham Has Faced a Stream of Exits in Europe, UK
6 minute read'Send These Guys Back to the US': Lawyers on Google's EU Antitrust Complaint Against Microsoft
4 minute readLinklaters Launches GenAI Training Programme for Lawyers
Linklaters, Freshfields, Kirkland & Ellis, Paul Weiss and Latham & Watkins Act on €6.2B Acquisition of Energy Firm Techem
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250