Lloyd's of London GC Peter Spires on modernisation, Brexit and his favourite lawyers
General counsel of 'world's specialist insurance market' on why there's nothing quite like Lloyd's
November 27, 2016 at 05:01 PM
8 minute read
"We have stability," says Peter Spires, the new general counsel at Lloyd's of London. Having joining from Memery Crystal at the end of 1995, he has been there ever since.
"It's technically demanding because there isn't anything else quite like Lloyd's – you need to have the ability to be creative," he says. "We have the power to make our own rules. Our bylaw structure, our conduct rules, they've all been promulgated under our own statutory arrangements. It's interesting to write the rules for the market."
The self-proclaimed 'world's specialist insurance market' houses more than 90 syndicates, focusing on specialist markets such as energy, marine and political risk. It can trace its origins back to Lloyd's Coffee House, which opened in 1688 – six years before the Bank of England was established.
Lloyd's' latest half-year pre-tax profits were strong at £1.46bn, up 20% on last year. Notwithstanding these results, stability has become a scarce commodity in insurance, particularly given the continued uncertainty over Brexit. Continental Europe accounts for roughly 11% of gross premiums written by the London market. In response to estimates that 4% of its revenues may disappear post-Brexit – because of EU passporting rights being lost – Lloyd's is formulating contingency plans to ensure that it can continue to trade across Europe following the UK's eventual departure from the EU.
As confirmed last month by Lloyd's chief executive Inga Beale, this may include establishing a subsidiary or branches in mainland Europe. An EU-wide subsidiary would be a more cost-effective option, according to Beale. "We are now focusing our attention on having in place the plans that will ensure Lloyd's continues trading across Europe," says Spires.
Brexit apart, current market dynamics and a fast-changing regulatory environment present significant further challenges. "Moving Solvency II into a business as usual environment has been a huge amount of work," says Spires. "The market, the managing agents of Lloyd's and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), are having to work out how to make that work best for everyone. At the same time, the PRA is very concerned about market conditions, making sure that underwriters are writing prudently. It's an interesting combination of events."
Lloyd's has done "an enormous amount" to meet the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) agenda, as Spires explains: "There hadn't been much focus on conduct issues in the Lloyd's market from the Financial Services Authority. Since 2014, we've ended up working very hard to roll out our own conduct standards for the market, to ensure that people understand exactly what the FCA expects from them in a subscription market."
His aim is "to get to a position where the FCA relies on the work that we conduct so that there isn't any duplication" by virtue of independent audits that they undertake. He describes the process as "really enjoyable", pointing to: "One line that said: 'would you sell this product to a member of your own family?' We realised that was too low a test and we had to change it to: 'would you sell it to a loved member of your family?'"
Spires adds: "Market conditions are very demanding for Lloyd's at the moment and for insurers generally. Meeting the prudential concern of protecting the market from the difficult market conditions is probably our number one priority."
He identifies those demanding conditions as an unusual combination of events caused by an unprecedented oversupply of capital and an absence of any major catastrophes. Rates and margins have been squeezed significantly. Spires is therefore understandably anxious that market participants don't move into "books of business that people aren't qualified to underwrite".
This, in turn, creates a further challenge: "Making sure that everyone has the capability to manage books of business that they may be tempted to move into in testing times. We don't want to see the mistakes of the 1990s repeated, when people didn't have the performance and capabilities to manage the books of business that they were underwriting."
Nevertheless, Spires' tone is one of measured reassurance, although he concedes: "Lloyd's is a complex place: technically complex, politically complex." To understand those complexities takes a long time, he adds, supporting the case for an increase in the size of his legal team, which is currently 21: "One of the difficulties we have is that you can't just recruit for a Lloyd's person, it takes up to 12 months before they fully appreciate the complexities of the place."
The team is split four ways: litigation, commercial, conduct, and franchising and regulatory relationship. Everyone works across different teams. Litigation is a primary focus: "Dealing with contentious proceedings against Lloyd's, a whole raft of internal appeals mechanisms, and an internal ombudsman scheme," he explains.
Lloyd's tries to keep "as much work in-house as we can; we pride ourselves on having the expertise to deal with most issues," says Spires. "We have a very rich training programme, which encourages people to spend time with law firms. We've had people seconded into us as well, most recently from Baker & McKenzie, which worked out very well."
But there is still much use of external specialist lawyers: Jon Lawrence, partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, who is "very strong on the competition side"; Baker & McKenzie which is "excellent for HR work and international issues"; Simon Cooper, partner at Ince & Co, who is "excellent for his in-depth litigation insurance knowledge"; and "we see a lot of David Weir at Norton Rose Fulbright on M&A and market issues". But, says Spires, "the problem with some law firms is that you end up getting more and more people being tacked onto their teams".
For complex bespoke issues, he therefore often instructs counsel directly: "I really like the fact that you choose one person and you continue to get that one person." He points to the excellence of Robin Knowles QC, who "sadly for us became a judge", because he was "so prepared to give such clear and structured answers on things, which was fantastic. That is one of the key strengths of counsel." He adds that Lloyd's has had "some really good experiences" with litigation specialist David Alexander QC and Richard Fisher at South Square. "For the really big-ticket issues," they have instructed Lord Grabiner QC among others.
Of the remaining teams, commercial handles all the contracts undertaken by Lloyd's – "Increasingly important as we continue to move into the modernisation of our back office. There are a lot of contractual issues for Lloyd's and for the London market as a whole," Spires explains. The conduct team, meanwhile, has responsibility for policyholder complaints combined with a regulatory enforcement function. "We still discipline people within the market, probably three or four cases year," he says. These are invariably disciplinary cases against Lloyd's members and underwriting agents.
The franchise and regulatory relationship team is, he says "a rich smorgasbord of everything else": capital markets work; business planning arrangements; competition issues; managing the relationship with the PRA and the FCA; and acquiring and defending overseas licences.
Overseas expansion is "very much part of the commercial agenda and therefore the response comes from the legal regulatory clients' viewpoint to enable that to operate effectively", he explains. Beyond the recent announcement over potential new operations in Europe, Brazil and India are longstanding targets for Lloyd's expansion – part of Lloyd's' Strategic Vision 2025 to develop overseas licences.
Lloyd's was the first reinsurer authorised to operate in Brazil after the opening of the reinsurance market in April 2008. Following changes in legislation, Lloyd's is also seeking to establish a reinsurance branch in India.
"They are challenging markets in different ways," says Spires. "We've recently tried to work out how we might underwrite direct insurance in Brazil. It had a local regulatory regime that made that very difficult, really intellectually demanding."
There is no predictability in Spires' work: "Every day you think you're going to come in to deal with one thing, but you'll suddenly be dealing with the issue of the day; it's genuinely exciting and exhilarating." Located at the heart of events – one floor above the limits of the trading floor in the Lloyd's building – Spires spends much of his day "working with the market, meeting the managing agents, or meeting with the market associations". He adds: "It's great to be at the heart of it all."
"I get calls from people saying: 'what's your view on this?' or 'tell me what the answer is on that?' It's a lovely experience to be able to instantly point them in the right direction. I feel very proud of the institution, it's something that really gets into your blood. There's a real team spirit in the market as a whole and that crosses across from brokers, to underwriters, to members; it's a cohesive environment where people want to make things work."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250