Uber turns to Cuatrecasas for landmark EU regulatory case
Spanish firm takes key role for Uber on ECJ dispute
November 29, 2016 at 05:31 AM
3 minute read
Uber Technologies has turned to Cuatrecasas Goncalves Pereira partner Cani Fernandez to argue on its behalf in a European Court of Justice hearing that could determine how Uber should be regulated within the European Union (EU).
Fernandez, who is director of the Spanish firm's competition and EU law practice, will attempt to persuade Europe's highest court that Uber is not a transportation company, but an app-based service under EU law, meaning that it would not be subject to stricter regulations governing the transportation industry.
Fernandez, who could not immediately be reached for comment, will be supported by lawyers from France's Gide Loyrette Nouel, according to a source familiar with the matter.
In 2014, three years after Uber launched its app in Europe, Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi, a Barcelona taxi drivers group, alleged that Uber was running an illegal cab service. Uber, for its part, contends it is a digital app and not a transportation service.
The case proceeded to a Spanish judge in 2015, who then turned to the Court of Justice of the European Union for clarification about Uber's status. He asked the court to look at whether a European directive on e-commerce would apply to Uber, and how the EU's unfair competition laws might apply to the digital ride-booking business.
If the court decides it is a transportation company under European law, Uber would be subject to stricter licencing, labour, insurance and safety rules. The ruling could also affect other companies in 'on-demand' economies that are trying to expand into Europe, according to a report from Reuters.
Fernandez is no stranger to the European Court of Justice. According to her firm biography, she served as a referendaire at the court from 1994 to 1997. In private practice, she has advised clients during European authorities' investigations into potential antitrust violations. She has worked on antitrust considerations in deals involving big-name companies like Coca-Cola and Telefonica.
She has also advised companies as well as EU governments and institutions on EU law issues related to plant and crop protection, chemicals and the environment, and government contracting.
Last month, UK Uber drivers won the right to be classed as workers rather than self-employed after succeeding in a landmark legal challenge. Uber, which was represented by DLA Piper, said it will appeal the ruling.
Earlier this year, Uber also instructed Hogan Lovells to challenge new rules introduced by Transport for London, which include requirements for drivers to speak a minimum standard of English and for drivers to have insurance cover when they are not working.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readUK Competition Watchdog Greenlights Google’s $2B Anthropic Investment, Lawyers Weigh in
Likely Next EU Competition Chief Keeps Cards Close to Her Chest in 3-Hour Confirmation Hearing
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250