'Lawyers are inclined to dress up automation as innovation' - Top 20 Legal IT Innovators 2016: Richard Susskind
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles…
December 07, 2016 at 06:56 AM
4 minute read
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles the law firm leaders, in-house lawyers and tech pioneers driving change in the legal profession.
Click here to download the report from Legal Week Law (free registration required).
Richard Susskind is a pivotal figure in legal technology. An acclaimed strategist and thinker, a distinguished academic (he holds professorships at Oxford and UCL among others), and author of nine influential books, Susskind has been an IT adviser to the Lord Chief Justice of England & Wales for nearly 20 years. In 2000, he received an OBE for his services to IT in the law and to the Administration of Justice, and since 2011, he has been president of the Society for Computers and Law.
"I've really tried to influence thinking across the legal profession," he says. "I like to think I have influenced a generation of lawyers in their thinking about the profound impact of technology on law." After writing his Oxford doctorate on law and AI in the mid-1980s, he developed with Phillip Capper (now a White & Case partner), the world's first commercially available AI system in law (The Latent Damage System) in 1988.
Susskind's global reach is significant: his work has been translated into 12 languages and he has lectured in more than 40 countries. At a practical level, his influence has been equally widespread as an adviser to several of the world's leading law firms on issues relating to future strategy and their use of technology. He describes the relationships with these firms, such as Allen & Overy, as "longstanding, not occasional projects".
More than anything Susskind sees himself as a catalyst. "Fundamentally, my interest is: can computers solve legal problems?" he explains. "That's partly a technical question and partly a philosophical question." But his ideas and his thinking are entirely pragmatic.
My running theme is for the 2020s: it's not going to be a decade of unemployment but it will be a decade of redeployment; we've got to learn to work differently
"Law firms can think they are innovative because they are automating in an innovative way because no one has ever automated in that way before," he says. "But my more technical meaning of innovation is really bringing about change in the underlying process. As in so many sectors, lawyers are inclined to dress up their automation as innovation. They want to suggest that the use of technology to streamline the old ways of working is perhaps more adventurous than it really is."
As a legal disruptor, Susskind questions the way in which law firms see themselves as businesses and how they offer services to clients.
"I want to challenge lawyers to understand the potential technology and use it," he says, "not simply to preserve 20th century legal practice, but to redefine the way the legal professionals can help their clients. By legal professionals, I don't just mean traditional lawyers, I mean people who are legal technologists and legal process analysts and legal knowledge engineers. My running theme is for the 2020s: it's not going to be a decade of unemployment but it will be a decade of redeployment; we've got to learn to work differently."
Challenging the status quo – the established ways of thinking and doing things – makes some lawyers feel uncomfortable, particularly when part of what he advocates is "taking the cost out of legal service". Looking ahead, Susskind believes the "more for less" challenge will be critical: "It's going to define and underpin the way that we evolve our legal services. Technology is one of the key ways of allowing us to do the same or a better job than in the past but for a lower cost – that's the key."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 2In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 3A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 4Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 5Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250