Barclays puts emphasis on innovation with six firms appointed to new panel
Ashurst and Simmons among firms chosen to work with bank on new ideas
December 08, 2016 at 04:08 AM
4 minute read
Six of Barclays' core advisers have won places on a new legal innovation panel being piloted for the bank, with Ashurst and Simmons & Simmons among those making the cut, Legal Week understands.
The bank selected the six firms based on four key criteria: the use of legal project managers, collaboration with other law firms or other services providers, sophistication around pricing arrangements, and thought leadership.
"Based on this, we have identified a group of law firms that we felt were the most aligned with what we are trying to achieve," said Stephanie Hamon, managing director of Barclays' newly created commercial management team, which sits in the bank's legal department.
Hamon ran the bank's overall panel review process, including the launch of the innovation pilot, alongside Chris Grant, a director and head of law firm management.
The pair selected firms from its core panel for the innovation pilot. While the bank declined to confirm the names of those appointed to the pilot, other key advisers have historically included Clifford Chance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters, Allen & Overy, Hogan Lovells and US firms such as Latham & Watkins, Shearman & Sterling and Sullivan & Cromwell.
Barclays is already working on various projects tied to the pilot, including several apps, with Hamon suggesting the bank is particularly interested in apps relating to regulatory changes associated with Brexit.
Outside of technology, Hamon said innovative ideas would include law firms hiring project managers, with Barclays playing a role in the recruitment process or giving the bank's legal team specific training for a new skillset.
She insisted that Barclays is not "pitching firms against each other", adding: "We are inundated with suggestions that we have to choose between. But it's not a competition between law firms. If the idea is good we will do it; it is not a question of saying we will only do three."
The innovation work will sit under the bank's relationship account system, which involves panel firms providing a certain volume of free legal services annually in return for a set volume of work from the bank. The account gives each panel firm credit in three areas: secondments, discounts on legal advice, and innovation. The relationship account covers all firms with which the bank spends at least £1m a year.
Grant, who joined the bank in 2004 from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, said the expectations for pilot firms' free legal services have not changed and that they would have to request approval "for use of the innovation funds". He added: "It may be that firms on the innovation pilot allocate more from the innovation category, but this is not mandated."
Hamon said law firms' innovative ideas had not previously been visible to the bank's senior management. "There was no visibility at a higher level, and law firms were not getting credit for it either. Talking to law firms, they have ideas but they weren't making their way to us."
The pilot was first set up as part of Barclays' wider panel review process this summer, which saw the lineup slashed by 60% to 140 firms.
The new roster, which took effect from 1 July for a two-year term, will be partially reviewed in January as a result of a change introduced as part of the latest review process. This will see each firm's position reviewed and the bank able to move it between tiers.
"Changes can be made to the coverage any firm may have," explained Grant. "We are actively managing the firms that we work with to make sure the coverage they have remains relevant."
Legal Week reported in June that Simmons, Ashurst and Hogan Lovells were among a number of firms holding onto places on the bank's panel.
Barclays introduced three tiers of adviser during the latest review: panel, core specialist and specialist. It previously had two tiers – preferred firms and approved firms. As part of this review, the bank also increased the trigger point for relationship account firms tendering for work from £25,000 to £100,000.
The commercial management team, which was set up in December when Hamon joined the bank from King & Wood Mallesons, is expected to boost efficiency within the legal department and deepen relationships with its external legal advisers. It now comprises 15 staff including Hamon and Grant.
Ashurst and Simmons did not respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhistleblowing in 2025: What's on the Horizon for GCs?
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250