From legal practice into tech - Top 20 Legal IT Innovators 2016: Weightmans' Stuart Whittle
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles…
December 08, 2016 at 05:19 PM
4 minute read
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles the law firm leaders, in-house lawyers and tech pioneers driving change in the legal profession.
Click here to download the report from Legal Week Law (free registration required).
Stuart Whittle is not unique, but he is unusual: a law firm partner who moved full time into IT and, since 2010, a member of Weightmans' management board. He now has more than a decade's experience as an innovative IT director at Weightmans. This dual perspective gives him a valuable understanding of what innovation means in practice.
His interest in IT started as a trainee solicitor: "The firm was acting on a huge class action for various law firms arising out of equity release mortgages," says Whittle. "Another firm presented us with a Microsoft Access 1995 database to help manage the litigation: beautifully crafted, but we couldn't get it to work for us.
"My IT partner said: do you know anything about IT? To which the answer was: not really. So he sent me on a lengthy Microsoft Access course – at the time, a radical thing to do. I then pulled this database apart and put it back together again. The frustration I've always had with the law is there are lots of right answers and you're never quite sure whether you've got the right one. In IT, it either works or it doesn't, or it works elegantly or it doesn't."
Whittle spent 10 years as a practising lawyer before moving full time into IT. "In my naive world as a lawyer, I was delivering services to clients: what I thought were the things the client wanted. When I got into IT – perspective is a wonderful thing – I quickly discovered that the suppliers I valued were those that knew more about my business than I did, the ones who understood I had a problem and made it go away."
Whittle ran the IT department for five years and then assumed responsibility for the firm's operational functions: marketing, HR, facilities, projects, risk and business processing engineering. After learning "some hard lessons in case management systems", he spent a year designing and rolling out basic workflows, making sure everybody in the firm was using the system. "We were early adopters of case management technology," he says.
If you can get a partner talking about how they've done something different for a client, that's what gets other partners interested
These internal systems have since progressed much further: "If the client wants to see management information that we collect," Whittle explains, "we can show them all the documents in the systems plus the financial information and aggregate it at a portfolio level." This is supplemented by providing clients with dashboards that help them derive meaning from the data.
Whittle has ensured that all systems have been fully integrated as a result of mergers by Weightmans. But being innovative for clients has been paramount: "The thing that drives lawyers is clients. Many of the changes we have introduced have been at the behest of a particular client. Having then used that in one area and shown that it works, we have rolled it out elsewhere."
His main challenge in being innovative? "Time. We don't lack great ideas but like many law firms, we are a victim: the urgent stuff always takes priority."
He is "genuinely interested" in what AI might do. "There's a lot of potential, particularly if you can do something with this huge corpus of information that my firm has: that combination of structured and unstructured data, to derive patterns and meaning from it and link that unstructured data to structured data. There is something very powerful there. But it's a big if."
Persuading lawyers to invest time (and money) is best done by results, as he explains: "By definition, lawyers are very good at telling you all the reasons why something won't work. Whatever you suggest isn't ever going to be perfect. But if you can get a partner talking about how they've done something different for a client, that's what gets other partners interested."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
- 2Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 3Lessons From Five Popular Change Management Concepts: A Guide for Law Firm Leaders in 2025
- 4People in the News—Jan. 15, 2025—Ballard Spahr, Brahin Law
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Stay Focused on Building Strong Relationships,' Says Joseph Yaffe of Skadden
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250