From legal practice into tech - Top 20 Legal IT Innovators 2016: Weightmans' Stuart Whittle
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles…
December 08, 2016 at 05:19 PM
4 minute read
Legal Week Intelligence, in association with Fulcrum GT, recently published the first edition of its Top 20 Legal IT Innovators report, which profiles the law firm leaders, in-house lawyers and tech pioneers driving change in the legal profession.
Click here to download the report from Legal Week Law (free registration required).
Stuart Whittle is not unique, but he is unusual: a law firm partner who moved full time into IT and, since 2010, a member of Weightmans' management board. He now has more than a decade's experience as an innovative IT director at Weightmans. This dual perspective gives him a valuable understanding of what innovation means in practice.
His interest in IT started as a trainee solicitor: "The firm was acting on a huge class action for various law firms arising out of equity release mortgages," says Whittle. "Another firm presented us with a Microsoft Access 1995 database to help manage the litigation: beautifully crafted, but we couldn't get it to work for us.
"My IT partner said: do you know anything about IT? To which the answer was: not really. So he sent me on a lengthy Microsoft Access course – at the time, a radical thing to do. I then pulled this database apart and put it back together again. The frustration I've always had with the law is there are lots of right answers and you're never quite sure whether you've got the right one. In IT, it either works or it doesn't, or it works elegantly or it doesn't."
Whittle spent 10 years as a practising lawyer before moving full time into IT. "In my naive world as a lawyer, I was delivering services to clients: what I thought were the things the client wanted. When I got into IT – perspective is a wonderful thing – I quickly discovered that the suppliers I valued were those that knew more about my business than I did, the ones who understood I had a problem and made it go away."
Whittle ran the IT department for five years and then assumed responsibility for the firm's operational functions: marketing, HR, facilities, projects, risk and business processing engineering. After learning "some hard lessons in case management systems", he spent a year designing and rolling out basic workflows, making sure everybody in the firm was using the system. "We were early adopters of case management technology," he says.
If you can get a partner talking about how they've done something different for a client, that's what gets other partners interested
These internal systems have since progressed much further: "If the client wants to see management information that we collect," Whittle explains, "we can show them all the documents in the systems plus the financial information and aggregate it at a portfolio level." This is supplemented by providing clients with dashboards that help them derive meaning from the data.
Whittle has ensured that all systems have been fully integrated as a result of mergers by Weightmans. But being innovative for clients has been paramount: "The thing that drives lawyers is clients. Many of the changes we have introduced have been at the behest of a particular client. Having then used that in one area and shown that it works, we have rolled it out elsewhere."
His main challenge in being innovative? "Time. We don't lack great ideas but like many law firms, we are a victim: the urgent stuff always takes priority."
He is "genuinely interested" in what AI might do. "There's a lot of potential, particularly if you can do something with this huge corpus of information that my firm has: that combination of structured and unstructured data, to derive patterns and meaning from it and link that unstructured data to structured data. There is something very powerful there. But it's a big if."
Persuading lawyers to invest time (and money) is best done by results, as he explains: "By definition, lawyers are very good at telling you all the reasons why something won't work. Whatever you suggest isn't ever going to be perfect. But if you can get a partner talking about how they've done something different for a client, that's what gets other partners interested."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250