Eversheds closes in on US merger decision with two thirds majority required in partner vote
Firm reaches decision day on proposed tie-up with US firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan
December 16, 2016 at 05:14 AM
3 minute read
Eversheds needs to secure the approval of two thirds of its partnership for its merger with US firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan to go ahead, with voting on the deal closing today (16 December).
The UK firm's leadership has been visiting its offices around the world in recent weeks, with chief executive Bryan Hughes, chief executive-elect Lee Ranson, chairman Paul Smith, international managing partner Ian Gray and incoming managing partner Keith Froud putting on a roadshow to discuss the merits of the proposed tie-up with partners.
The feeling within the firm is that Eversheds partners are likely to approve the deal by the required two thirds majority.
One partner told Legal Week: "I don't think anyone at the top level is sweating the detail. Anecdotally, the partnership feels very much in favour of the merger."
US firm Sutherland also needs two thirds of its partners to agree to the deal for it go ahead. If approved, the firms will combine as Eversheds Sutherland early next year under a company limited by guarantee structure, as used by legacy Wragge & Co in its merger with Canadian firm Gowlings in February.
The combined firm will be governed by two boards – an executive board consisting of three partners from each firm that will meet monthly, and a supervisory board of partners from each side.
Partners inside Eversheds suggest that the most likely UK candidates for the executive are Ranson, managing partner Froud, and Gray, who is taking up a role as Eversheds executive partner from May.
Smith is likely to sit on the supervisory board alongside members of Eversheds' current board and representatives from its international offices.
According to partners, the two firms have worked together for three years, with merger talks becoming increasingly serious during recent months.
Eversheds is the larger of the two firms by both revenue and lawyer count. It posted turnover of £405.5m in 2015-16, compared to Sutherland's $301m in 2015. Eversheds employed around 1,400 lawyers that year, compared to roughly 400 at Sutherland.
A US tie-up has been a longstanding ambition of the firm and its outgoing chief executive Hughes. In 2015, Eversheds held merger talks with US firm Foley & Lardner but the talks collapsed before they reached a partnership vote.
Eversheds and Sutherland confirmed they were in merger talks at the end of November. If the deal goes ahead, it will be the most significant transatlantic tie-up since Norton Rose combined with Fulbright & Jaworski in 2013.
Eversheds declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn, Linklaters Advise on Talabat’s $2BN IPO in World’s Largest Tech IPO of 2024
2 minute readLatham, Skadden Among Firms Acting on Mubadala's $3.4 B Acquisition of CI Financial
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer as Litigant as Late Fees Take Spotlight in Class Action
- 2Burns White Names Conshohocken Litigator as New CEO
- 3Mattel Sued Over 'Wicked' Dolls With Pornographic Website
- 4Brown Rudnick’s Brand and Reputation Group Unfazed After Loss of 6 Prominent Partners and Their Big-Name Clients
- 5Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250