Ashurst partners approve move to annual profit payout
Ashurst partners will receive a single annual profit distribution on top of monthly drawings from May next year, ending the existing quarterly payment schedule
December 22, 2016 at 06:02 AM
3 minute read
Ashurst partners have voted in favour of overhauling the firm's profit distribution system in a move that means partners will only receive a single profit payment each year, instead of the current quarterly system.
The change, which required the approval of 50% of the partnership, will take effect from 1 May 2017, when partners will receive any outstanding distributions relating to the 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years.
From then on, profit distributions will be made annually in April for the preceding financial year.
Monthly drawings are unaffected and will continue to be paid out as normal.
Ashurst managing partner Paul Jenkins said: "I am pleased that partners have given overwhelming support for the changes required to harmonise our global partner payments. After a strong first half of the financial year for the firm, it was the right time to make these changes, which we discussed at the time of the merger.
"We will be bringing partners up to date so all profits up to 1 May 2016 will have been fully paid out and all profits in future years will be paid out within 12 months of the end of each financial year."
As a result of the change there will be a small increase in net capital of £1m.
Jenkins said at that time that monthly drawings would increase slightly as a result of the new system, which was designed to bring greater alignment between profit distributions in the UK and Australia.
The overhaul was announced after Ashurst delayed the quarterly distribution due to partners in August after a difficult 2015-16, paying it out in November.
Revenue and profit per equity partner both plunged by double digits in 2015-16, with the firm subsequently seeing a flood of partner exits – some of which were related to the poor financial performance.
Departures in recent months have included a number of office heads. In September, it emerged that Brussels managing partner Carl Meyntjens, Singapore managing partner Shaun Lascelles and Abu Dhabi managing partner Alastair Holland were all leaving the firm.
However, the firm managed to persuade two high profile partners who had previously handed in their notice to stay – finance partner Nigel Ward, who had been due to join Paul Hastings; and financial regulation partner James Perry, who had been recruited by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher.
Ashurst also recently voted in changes to its partner remuneration structure, adding an extra 10 points to the top of the equity ladder and introducing a bonus pool in an attempt to better reward high performing partners.
Jenkins spoke to Legal Week earlier this year about his plans to turn the firm around after a difficult 12 months, emphasising the importance of improving profitability and a plan to measure the performance of individual offices.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250