Ashurst accounts shed light on profits dip and cost of firm-wide investments
LLPs show 22% net profit dip after investment in new premises and IT projects
February 07, 2017 at 09:50 AM
2 minute read
Ashurst saw operating profit drop by more than 20% during 2015-16, after a challenging year in which the firm made significant investment in new premises and IT systems, the firm's limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts show.
Operating profit fell by 21% from £193.1m to £152.1m, while net profit fell 22% from £186.6m to £144.8m, as revenue dropped 10% from £560.9m to £505.2m.
The accounts, which were filed at Companies House this month, state that the firm "entered into finance leases and other financing transactions in respect of assets with a total value of £12.7m".
Cash at bank and in hand fell from £28.7m to £15.8m, while the value of tangible assets doubled, up from £34.5m to £69.9m.
The year saw the firm invest in new premises and IT infrastructure projects, including a move into new premises in Sydney, with money also spent on new practice management and business intake systems.
The accounts show Ashurst's top management team took home £9.4m last year, a drop of 8% from the previous year's figure of £10.3m. The firm's highest paid partner took home £1.09m, up from £1.01m in 2014-15.
The firm paid out £189m in salaries during the 2015-16 financial year – a slight dip of 1% on the previous year's figure. The average number of people employed by the firm grew from 2,651 to 2,722, although total fee earners fell from 1,399 to 1,368.
The results mark a second year of declining figures for Ashurst, which posted single-digit drops in revenue and profit per equity partner (PEP) for 2014-15. It means that since 2013-14 PEP has tumbled by 24.7%, with revenue declining by 14%. The PEP figure the firm posted for 2015-16 is the lowest at any point since 2004-05, when it stood at £567,000.
The filing follows a turbulent 12 months for the firm, which has suffered a number of partner departures including several office heads. In December last year, the firm overhauled its profit distribution system in a move that means partners will receive a single profit payment each year.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1New Research Study Predicts Continued Growth for Generative AI in Legal
- 2Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Office & Dragons
- 3Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 4Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 5Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250