Norton Rose Fulbright agrees combination with Chadbourne & Parke
Chadbourne name to disappear as merger deal creates $2bn firm
February 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM
4 minute read
Norton Rose Fulbright has confirmed that it is to merge with Chadbourne & Parke, in a deal that creates a firm with combined revenues of just under $2bn (£1.61bn).
News of the merger talks broke earlier this month (2 February) after months of discussions, and the deal will go live in the second quarter of this year.
The merged firm will operate as Norton Rose Fulbright. Chadbourne, which operated as an independent firm for 115 years but had struggled recently with defections, will leave its name behind.
The combination creates a firm with around 1,000 lawyers in the US, including more than 300 in New York and around 130 in Washington DC. Globally, it will house more than 4,000 lawyers across 58 offices in 32 countries.
Norton Rose Fulbright posted global revenue of $1.74bn (£1.38bn) in 2015, with Chadbourne posting revenue of $249m (£198m).
The deal represents a second major US combination for Norton Rose following its deal with Texas-headquartered Fulbright & Jaworski in 2013. Peter Martyr, Norton Rose Fulbright's global chief executive, said linking up with Chadbourne is the firm's most significant merger since.
"Joining forces with our new colleagues, we can offer our clients significant new capabilities in New York and Washington DC," Martyr said in a statement. "We will benefit from new offices in Mexico City, Sao Paulo and Istanbul, and we will be able to offer our clients expanded capabilities in London, Dubai, Latin America and other key markets."
Daryl Lansdale, Norton Rose Fulbright's San Antonio-based US managing partner, said the deal would also boost the firm's Texas operations by adding lawyers in the financial center of New York and in DC, where regulatory work affects Texas clients in the energy sector and beyond. The firm will have about 450 lawyers in Texas, he said.
Lansdale said Chadbourne not only brings its energy practice to the merger, but is also "very deep" in project finance, infrastructure and other power projects that are important to the Texas market.
While nine Norton Rose Fulbright lawyers jumped to Baker Botts on the same day the Chadbourne merger was announced, Lansdale said he is not aware of any other groups moving out of Norton Rose Fulbright. "We're doing this because the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. This will give us an opportunity to further expand and grow the firm," he said.
Sources close to Chadbourne say the firm had approached firms including Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper and Hogan Lovells to discuss merger options during the past year, before agreeing its deal with Norton Rose.
The firm has seen a stream of partner exits in recent months, with those in the past year including corporate and project finance partner Margarita Oliva Sainz de Aja, who joined Baker McKenzie last month; a three-partner arbitration team who joined Cooley last December; and bankruptcy partner Douglas Deutsch, who joined Clifford Chance last summer.
Norton Rose has grown through a succession of major international combinations. It joined up with Australian firm Deacons in 2010, then in 2011 with Canadian firm Ogilvy Renault and leading South African firm Deneys Reitz. These were followed by a second Canadian tie-up with Calgary's Macleod Dixon in 2012. More recently, it inked a deal with Vancouver-based firm Bull Housser & Tupper last month.
In November, it was widely reported that the firm held merger talks with Australia's Henry Davis York.
Additional reporting by Brenda Sapino Jeffreys.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250