Yahoo general counsel resigns amid data breach controversy
GC steps down after investigation reveals legal team's failures over 2014 security breach
March 02, 2017 at 05:05 AM
3 minute read
Yahoo general counsel Ron Bell is leaving the tech giant after an investigation of the company revealed that its legal team failed to sufficiently inquire into a massive 2014 cybersecurity breach.
According to a 1 March filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Bell "resigned as the company's general counsel and secretary and from all other positions with the company", effective Wednesday (1 March). The filing said that "no payments are being made to Mr Bell in connection with his resignation."
In addition to announcing Bell's departure, the filing revealed the results of an investigation by an independent committee of Yahoo's board of directors, with assistance from US law firm Sidley Austin, into a 2014 hack of the company's networks that impacted at least 500 million customer email accounts.
Yahoo, which did not immediately respond to request for comment on Bell's departure, explained in the filing that certain senior executives at Yahoo as well as members of its legal team "had sufficient information to warrant substantial further inquiry in 2014" about a hack by a state-sponsored actor into the company's networks, but "they did not sufficiently pursue it".
"As a result, the 2014 security incident was not properly investigated and analysed at the time and the company was not adequately advised with respect to the legal and business risks associated with the 2014 security incident," the filing said. "The Independent Committee found that failures in communication, management, inquiry and internal reporting contributed to the lack of proper comprehension and handling of the 2014 security incident."
The company did not disclose the 2014 data breach to the public until September 2016. Then, in December 2016, the company admitted that it had suffered yet another breach in 2013, which had affected more than one billion user accounts.
Aside from raising questions about the company's security and disclosure practices, the delayed public disclosure of the two massive breaches has at times led to speculation that Verizon's acquisition of Yahoo's operating business may be in jeopardy.
A 21 February SEC filing from Verizon, however, revealed that the deal is moving forward, though the price has been reduced by $350m (£285m), from approximately $4.83bn (£3.93bn) in cash to roughly $4.48bn (£3.65bn).
At least nine US law firms advised on the deal, including Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati and Weil Gotshal & Manges for Yahoo, with Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Covington & Burling and Winston & Strawn acting for Verizon.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Setting Standards: Vanguard Australia's Sean Hughes on Moving From Government Regulator to Corporate General Counsel
6 minute read
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
